BAĞLANMA BOYUTLARININ ÖZTANIMLAYICI ANI ANLATILARI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ: BİR PSİKOLOJİK METİN ANALİZİ

Author :  

Year-Number: 2018-25
Language : null
Konu :
Number of pages: 5471-5487
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, bağlanma kaygı ve kaçınma boyutlarının öztanımlayıcı anıların içeriksel özellikleri ile ilişkisini incelemektir. Araştırma kapsamında 31 yetişkinden (23 kadın, 8 erkek) elde edilen 143 anının içeriği değerlendirilmiştir. Anıların içeriği LIWC Türkçe Psikolojik Metin Analizi Programı aracılığı ile hesaplanan dilsel kategoriler üzerinden analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, bağlanma kaygısının öztanımlayıcı anılarda kaygı bildiren ifadelerin kullanımını pozitif yönde yordadığını göstermiştir. Ayrıca bağlanma kaygı ve kaçınma boyutlarının ortak etkisinin, öfke bildiren ifadelerin, arkadaşlık ilişkisini temsil eden ifadelerin, hareket bildiren ifadelerin ve fiillerde şimdiki zaman kullanımını yordadığı gözlenmiştir. Ortak etkiler incelendiğinde, kaçınmacı bireylerin öztanımlayıcı anı aktarımlarında korkulu bağlananlara kıyasla öfke ifadelerini daha sık kullandığı, fakat fiillerde hareket bildiren ifadeleri ve şimdiki zamanı daha nadir kullandığı gözlenmiştir. Ayrıca, güvenli bağlanma stiline sahip bireyler, arkadaşlıkla ilişkili ifadeleri saplantılı bağlananlara oranla daha sık kullanmışlardır. Bulgular, bağlanma boyutlarının öztanımlayıcı anı içeriklerinin duyuşsal, sosyal ve dilsel özellikleri üzerinde önemli bir etkiye sahip olduğuna işaret etmektedir.

Keywords

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to investigate the relationship of attachment anxiety and avoidance dimensions to the content features of self-defining memories. The content of 143 memories collected from 31 adults (women = 23, men = 8) was examined using Turkish version of LIWC. Results revealed that attachment anxiety positively predicted the use of words referring to anxiety. The interaction of attachment anxiety and avoidance predicted the use of the words referring to anger, friendship, and motion, and the present tense. The interaction patterns showed that in their self-defining memory reports avoidant individuals were more likely to use the anger-related words, but less likely to use motion-related words and the present tense compared to fearful individuals. Results also indicated that individuals with secure attachment style were more likely to use words referring to friendship than preoccupied individuals. Findings indicate that attachment dimensions have a considerable effect on the affective, social, and linguistics aspects of the self-defining memories.

Keywords


  • Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. American Psychologist, 44(4), 709-716.

  • Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. American Psychologist, 44(4), 709-716.

  • Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E. ve Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Alexander, K. W., O’Hara, K. D., Bortfeld, Anderson, S. J., Newton, E. K. ve Kraft, R. H. (2010). Memoryfor emotional experiences in the context of attachment and social interaction style. Cognitive Development, 25, 325-338.

  • Baldwin, M. W., Keelan, J. P. R., Fehr, B., Enns, V. ve Koh-Rangarajoo, E. (1996). Social-cognitiveconceptualization of attachment working models: Availability and accessibility effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 94-109.

  • Bartholomew, K. ve Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four- category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226-244.

  • Blagov, P. ve Singer, J. A. (2004). Four dimensions of self-defining memories (Content, specificity,meaning, and affect) and their relationship to self-restraint, distress, and repressive defensiveness. Journal of Personality, 72, 481-511.

  • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss, Vol.1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books.

  • Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss, Vol.2: Separation, anxiety and anger. New York: Basic Books.

  • Boyacıoğlu, İ. (2012). Otobiyografik ve öztanımlayıcı anıların fenomenolojik özellikleri üzerinde bağlanma boyutlarının etkisi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 27, 84-96.

  • Boyacıoğlu, İ. ve Sümer, N. (2011). Bağlanma boyutları, otobiyografik bellek ve geçmişi kabul etme. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 26, 105-118.

  • Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L. ve Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: Anintegrative overview. J. A. Simpson ve W. S. Rholes içinde (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp.46-76). New York: Guilford Press.

  • Brown, J. D. (1998). The self. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Collins, N. L. ve Allard, L. M. (2001). Cognitive representations of attachment: The content and function ofworking models. G. J. O. Fletcher ve M.S. Clark (Eds.). Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes içinde (60-85). Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Collins, N. L. ve Read, S. J. (1994). Cognitive representations of attachment: The structure and function ofworking models. K. Bartholomew ve D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships içinde (5. Cilt, 53-90). London: Jessica Kingsley.

  • Conway, M. A., Singer, J. A. ve Tagini, A. (2004). The self and autobiographical memory: Correspondence and coherence. Social Cognition, 22(5), 491-529.

  • Dozier, M. ve Kobak, R. R. (1992). Psychophysiology in attachment interviews: Converging evidence for deactivating strategies. Child Development, 63(6), 1473-1480.

  • Edelstein, R. S. (2006). Attachment and emotional memory: Investigating the source and extent of avoidant memory impairments. Emotion, 6, 340-345.

  • Farrar, M. J., Fasig, L. G. ve Welch-Ross, M. K. (1997). Attachment and emotion in autobiographical memory development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 67, 389-408.

  • Fraley, R. C., Davis, K. E. ve Shaver, P. R. (1998). Dismissing-avoidance and the defensive organization ofemotion, cognition, and behavior. J. A. Simpson ve W. S. Rholes, (Ed.), Attachment theory and close relationships içinde (249-279). NewYork: Guilford.

  • Fraley, R. C., Garner, J. P. ve Shaver, P. R. (2000). Adult attachment and the defensive regulation ofattention and memory: The role of preemptive and postemptive processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 816-826.

  • Fraley, R. C. ve Shaver, P. R. (2000). Adult romantic attachment: Theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions. Review of General Psychology, 4, 132-154.

  • Fraley, R. C. ve Waller, N. G. (1998). Adult attachment patterns: A test of typological models. J.A. Simpson ve W.S. Rholes (Eds.). Attachment theory and close relationships içinde (77-114). NewYork: Guilford.

  • Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G. ve Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item-response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350-365.

  • George, C., Kaplan, N. ve Main, M. (1985). Attachment interview for adults. Unpublished Manuscript, University of California: Berkeley.

  • Haggerty, G. D., Siefert, C. J. ve Weinberger, J. (2010). Examining the relationship between currentattachment status and freely recalled autobiographical memories of childhood. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 27(1), 27-41.

  • Hazan, C. ve Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511-524.

  • Hesse, E. (1996). Discourse, memory, and the adult attachment interview: A note with emphasis on the emerging cannot classify category. Infant Mental Health Journal, 17 (1), 4-11.

  • Hesse, E. (1999). The adult attachment interview: Historical and current perspectives. J. Cassidy ve P.R.Shaver (Eds.) Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications içinde (395-433). New York: Guilford.

  • Jardine, K. F. (1999). Transitions of women counsellors-in-training: Self-defining memories, narratives, andpossible selves. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social-Sciences, 59(11-A): 4068.

  • Kirsh, S. J. (1996). Attachment style and recognition of emotionally-laden drawings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83, 607-610.

  • Knudson, R. M., Adame, A. L. ve Finocan, G. M. (2006). Significant dreams: Repositioning the self narrative. Dreaming, 16(3), 215-222.

  • Main, M., Kaplan, N. ve Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to thelevel of representation. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50 (1-2, Serial No. 219), 66-104.

  • McLean, K. C. (2005). Late adolescent identity development: Narrative meaning making and memory telling. Developmental Psychology, 41(4), 683-691.

  • McLean, K. C. (2008). Stories of the young and the old: Personal continuity and narrative identity. Developmental Psychology, 44(1), 254-264.

  • McLean, K. C. ve Fournier, M. (2008). The content and processes of autobiographical reasoning in narrative identity, Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 527-545.

  • McLean, K. C. ve Pasupathi, M. (2006). Collaborative narration of the past and extraversion. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 1219-1231.

  • McLean, K. C. ve Pratt, M. W. (2006). Life's little (and big) lessons: Identity statuses and meaning-making in the turning point narratives of emerging adults, Developmental Psychology, 42, 714-722.

  • McLean, K. C. ve Thorne, A. (2003). Adolescents' self-defining memories about relationships. Developmental Psychology, 39, 635-645.

  • Mikulincer, M. (1995). Attachment style and the mental representation of the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1203-1215.

  • Mikulincer, M. (1997). Adult attachment style and information processing: Individual differences in curiosity and cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 1217-1230.

  • Mikulincer, M. (1998). Adult attachment style and affect regulation: Strategic variations in self-appraisals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 420-435.

  • Mikulincer, M. ve Florian, V. (1998). The relationship between adult attachment styles and emotional andcognitive reactions to stressful events. J. A. Simpson and W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships içinde (143-165). New York: Guilford Press.

  • Mikulincer, M. ve Florian, V. (2004). Attachment style and affect regulation: Implications for coping stressand mental health. M. B. Brewer and M. Hewstone (Eds.) Applied Social Psychology içinde (28-49). Oxford, UK ve Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

  • Mikulincer, M. ve Orbach, I. (1995). Attachment styles and repressive defensiveness: The accessibility and architecture of affective memories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), 917-925.

  • Mikulincer, M. ve Shaver, P. R. (2003). The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation,psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 53-152.Mikulincer, M. ve Shaver, P. R. (2005). Attachment theory and emotions in close relationships: Exploringthe attachment-related dynamics of emotional reactions to relational events. Personal Relationships, 12, 149- 168.

  • Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R. ve Pereg, D. (2003). Attachment theory and affect regulation: The dynamics,development, and cognitive consequences of attachment-related strategies. Motivation and Emotion, 27(2), 77-102.

  • Miller, J. B. (1999). Attachment style and memory for attachment-related events. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16(6), 773-801.

  • Moffitt, K. H. ve Singer, J. A. (1994). Continuity in the life story: Self-defining memories, affect, and approach/avoidance personal strivings. Journal of Personality, 62, 21-43.

  • Müderrisoğlu, S. (2012). Türkçe psikolojik metin analizi programı: LIWC Türkçe. 17. Ulusal Psikoloji Kongresi. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi, İstanbul.

  • Pennebaker, J. W., Booth, R. J. ve Francis, M. E. (2007). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC2007): A text analysis program. Austin, TX: LIWC.net.

  • Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E. ve Booth, R. J. (2001). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC):LIWC2001. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. http://homepage.psy.utexas.edu/homepage/faculty/pennebaker/reprints/LIWC2001.pdf

  • Reese, E. (2002). Social factors in the development of autobiographical memory: The state of the art. Social Development, 11(1), 124-142.

  • Selçuk, E., Günaydın, G., Sümer, N. ve Uysal, A. (2005). Yetişkin bağlanma boyutları için yeni bir ölçüm:Yakın İlişkilerde Yaşantılar Envanteri-II’nin Türk örnekleminde psikometrik açıdan değerlendirilmesi, Türk Psikoloji Yayınları, 8 (16), 1-11.

  • Shaver, P. R. ve Mikulincer, M. (2002a). Dialogue on adult attachment: Diversity and integration. Attachment ve Human Development, 4(2), 243-257.

  • Shaver, P. R. ve Mikulincer, M. (2002b). Attachment-related psychodynamics. Attachment ve Human Development, 4(2), 133-161.

  • Singer, J. A. (2005). Memories that matter: How to use self-defining memories to understand and change your life. Oakland: New Harbinger Publications.

  • Singer, J. A. ve Bluck, S. (2001). New perspectives on autibiographical memory: The integration of narrative processing and autobiographical reasoning. Review of General Psychology, 5(2), 91-99.

  • Singer, J. A. ve Salovey, P. (1993). The remembered self: Emotion and memory in personality. New York: Free Press.

  • Sümer, N. (2006). Yetişkin bağlanma ölçeklerinin kategoriler ve boyutlar düzeyinde karşılaştırılması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 21(57), 1-22.

  • Tausczik, Y. R. ve Pennebaker J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24-54.

  • Thorne, A., McLean, K. C. ve Lawrence, A. M. (2004). When remembering is not enough: Reflecting on self-defining memories in late adolescence. Journal of Personality, 72(3), 513-541.

  • Warren, S. L., Bost, K. K., Roisman, G. I., Silton, R. L., Spielberg, J. M. Engels, A. S., Choi, E. Sutton, B.P., Millet, G. A. ve Heller, W. (2010). Effects of adult attachment and emotional distractors on brain mechanisms of cognitive control. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1818-1826.

  • Waters, H. S., & Rodrigues-Doolabh, L. (2004). Manual for decoding secure base narratives. Unpublished manuscript, State University of New York at Stony Brook.

  • Waters, H. S., Rodrigues, L. M. ve Ridgeway, D. (1998). Cognitive underpinnings of narrative attachment assessment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 211-234.

  • Self-defining memory (SDM) is a specific type of autobiographical memory that is closely associated withdevelopmental goals of the self (Conway et al., 2004). Attachment orientations are most probably one of themain sources of individual differences in autobiographical memories. Attachment-related behaviours aresupposed to be organized around an affect-regulation system (Mikulincer & Florian, 2004) which serves as aprotective mechanism to cope with threatening stimuli (e.g., emotional memories). Addition to affectregulation strategies, the differences in the mental representations of the self and the others (Barthelomew &Horowitz, 1991) underlie the relationship between attachment behavioural system and autobiographicalmemory. The present study aims to investiagate how attachment anxiety and avoidance relate to content features of SDMs on the basis of previous research.

  • The limited number of studies has provided strong evidence for the effect of attachment on memoryprocesses. For instance, Mikulincer and Orbach (1995) demonstrated that secure individuals were morelikely to have moderate defensiveness, low anxiety, and high accessibility of negative memories, whereas theanxious-ambivalent attachment was marked by relatively high levels of anxiety and low levels ofdefensiveness. Avoidant persons were the most defensive group to negative memories and reportedmoderate-high levels of anxiety, so that their style was insufficient for reducing anxiety in spite of their highlevels of repression. Edelstein (2006) also found that avoidant individuals defensively limit the processing ofinformation that could activate attachment behavioural system. The results from the Adult AttachmentInterview (AAI) showed that secure discourse is marked by the capacity for fluid shifting of focus ofattention between memories evoked by discourse task and maintenance of coherent discourse with theinterviewer, whereas dismissing individuals tend to minimize the attention to attachment-related experiencesand preoccupied individuals overemphasize the attachment-related experiences (Hesse, 1996). In the contextof the phenomenological characteristics of autobiograpgical memories, Boyacioglu and Sumer (2011) foundthat attachment anxiety dimension predicted negative valence, visceral reactions during the recall, and vividness, whereas attachment avoidance dimension negatively predicted recollection.

  • Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised. ECR-R developed by Fraley et. al. (2000) is a self-reportmeasure for adult romantic attachment that consists of 18 items for attachment anxiety and 18 items for attachment avoidance.

  • In considering the affective association between attachment and SDMs, the results showed that individualswith an anxious attachment orientation were more likely to recall the SDMs which had anxious emotionaltone, as expected. Hyperactivating strategies seem to trigger anxiety during the recall of important memorieswhich serve in defining the self. As mentioned before, preoccupied individuals display a negative, simple,and less integrated self-structure. In other words, anxious attachment orientation is marked by negative self-view, low integration, and low differentiation of self-representations (Mikulincer, 1995). As seen inExamples 1 and 2, the participants with an anxious attachment orientation generally recalled negative eventsand expressed strongly their negative feelings. Especially in Example 2, affective arousal appears to initiatespread activation throughout the system and to cause the recall of separate negative events simultaneously. Example 1. ‘In the summer I graduated from primary school, my dad got sick. After the meal, he

  • With regard to attachment avoidance, the significant interaction showed that avoidant individuals were morelikely to use words related to anger than fearful individuals. Recall of the memories which are central for theself may be perceived as a threat by avoidant individuals and as a result, they may experience the feeling ofanger more strongly than fearful individuals. As mentioned before, avoidants have unrealistic positive self-views (Mikulincer, 1995, 1998), while fearfuls are suffered from the attachment pattern consisting bothnegative models for the self and for the others (Bartholomew ve Horowitz, 1991). Morevover, attachmentavoidance is related to negative emotions such as supressed anger, hostility, and hostile envy in the romanticrelationship contexts (Mikulincer ve Shaver, 2005). Therefore, evaluation of their self, self-related goals, orclose relationships may reflect on the use of words related to anger in regard to avoidant attachment. Incontrast, fearful individuals may have more ambivalent feelings during the recall of SDMs due to theircomplex secondary affect-regulation strategies. As seen in Examples, the main emotional tone of theparticipant with an avoidant attachment orientation against the loose of an important person or its possibility is anger.

  • The significant interaction showed that secure individuals were more likely to use words referring tofriendship such as “pal, buddy” than preoccupied individuals. This finding is unexpected at first glance sincepreoccupied individuals have insistent need to be loved and accepted by others (Mikulincer ve Florian,1998). Therefore, one might predict a positive association between words related to social relationships andanxious attachment orientation. Preoccupied participants might focus their relationships with their parents orromantic partners rather than their friends in their SDMs. Further exploration is required of this link in future studies.

  • Another finding related to narrative style showed that avoidant individuals used the present tenses lessfrequently than did fearful individuals. For avoidant individuals, the tendency to avoid using the presenttenses seems to serve as a shield for emotional content of personal memories and the past tenses may help tokeep away emotional experiences in terms of time and perception. Shaver and Mikulincer (2002b) noted thatfearfully avoidant individuals are similar to the AAI’s E3 subcategory of U category which is characterizedby traumas and losses. In U category of the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) method, E3 which is asubcategory of preoccupied attachment is marked by intense anxiety and disorganized and generallytraumatic-related discourse. Accordingly, fearful individuals may fail to protect the distance between the present and the time when the event occurred.

  • In summary, the results of the present study indicated that attachment dimensions have a considerable impacton the content features of the SDMs. Avoidant attachment orientation was found to be related to the use ofthe present tenses, and words referring to anger and motion, while anxious attachment orientation was foundto be related the use of words referring to anxiety and friendship. Research on the relationships attachmentand memory contents using the content analysis programmes is relatively novel in the literature. On the basisof the past research such as the AAI classification method (George et al., 1985; Main et al., 1985) and securescript base method (Waters et al., 1998; Waters & Rodrigues-Doolabh, 2004), some content analysistechnique specific to attachment-related discourse in order to investigate qualitative nature of the relationshipbetween the attachment behavioural system and the autobiographical memory system could be developed infuture studies. Such advances in evaluation of the content of memories would be beneficial not only for thefurther studies on attachment-related memory processes, but also on cognitive structures and processes underlying attachment internal working models.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics