Author :
Abstract
21. yüzyılda yükseköğretimde uluslararası boyut çok daha kapsamlı ve stratejik bir sürece dönüşmekte, uluslararası eğitim ve araştırma faaliyetleri yaygınlaşmakta, sınır ötesi yükseköğretim büyümektedir. Ancak uluslararası hareketlilik tüm olumlu getirilerine karşın mevcut eşitsizlikleri derinleştirme riski de taşımaktadır. Küresel yükseköğretim piyasası katmanlaşmakta, ülkeler ve kurumlar arasında bir hiyerarşi oluşmaktadır. Yine, uluslararası hareketliliğin gerektirdiği finansman olanaklarına sahip olmayan öğrenciler dolaşımın dışında kalmaktadır. Bu yönüyle uluslararası eğitim, erişim olanağına sahip olan bir azınlık için işgücü piyasasında açık bir rekabet avantajına dönüşmektedir. Uluslararasılaşmanın bu yüzü akademik tartışmaların da odağına taşınmakta, eşitsizlikleri azaltıcı yöntemler üzerinde durulmaktadır. "Kampüste uluslararasılaşma" kavramı da bu arayıştan yola çıkan yeni bir uluslararasılaşma yaklaşımı sunmaktadır. Kampüste uluslararasılaşma öğrencilerin yurtdışına çıkmadan üniversite eğitimleri boyunca kültürlerarası ve uluslararası yetkinlikleri kazanabilmeleri hedefleyen bir uluslararasılaşma anlayışıdır. Bu yaklaşım müfredattan sosyal faaliyetlere kadar birçok alanda ve tüm öğrencilere yönelik kapsamlı bir stratejiye dayanmaktadır. Bu nedenle kampüste uluslararasılaşma üniversiteler için zor ve uzun bir yol anlamına gelmektedir. Ancak, üniversiteler böyle bir vizyonla yola çıkarak özellikle dezavantajlı öğrenci grupları açısından önemli kazanımlar sağlayabilecektir. Bu çalışma kampüste uluslararasılaşma kavramıyla Türkiye'deki yükseköğretim literatürüne katkıda bulunmayı ve uygulayıcılar için farklı bir bakış açısı sunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu kapsamda bu alandaki uluslararası literatür incelenmekte ve stratejiler ortaya konmaktadır.
Keywords
Abstract
In the 21th century international dimension of higher education have been transforming into a much more strategic phenemenon and cross border education have been widening. Yet, the growth of international education and mobility has brought about a risk of deeepening inequalities which are already inherent in the world. Global education market has been based on a hierarchical structure between advanced countries and underdeveloped ones. International mobility too, serves most to the advantage of richer students. This face of international education has been on the agenda of scholars who search for more egalitarian approaches. Internationalization at home- IaH is a new approach which aims to help all higher education students achieve international and intercultural dimensions, and to ensure that returning students from international exchange programs have opportunities to “integrate their study abroad experiences and provide alternative international experiences at home for those who choose not to study abroad. Stemming from its comprehensive and qualitative approach, this model can be regarded as a long difficult road. Yet, IaH approach might be relatively good starting point for those who do not benefit from international education and particularly for universities which are at disadvantageous position in global market. Thus, the main objective of this paper is to introduce IaH concept to Turkish literature and to set a different perspective for policy makers.
Keywords
- Altbach, P. (2002). Perspectives on international higher education: Change in UK higher education.
- Altbach, P. (2002). Perspectives on international higher education: Change in UK higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(6),459-475.
- Altbach, P. (2004). Globalisation and the university: Myths and realities in an unequal world. Tertiary Education and Management, 10(1), 3-25.
- Amit, V. (2010). Student mobility and internationalisation: Rationales, rhetoric and institutional isomorphism. Anthropology in Action 17(1):6-18.
- Barnick, H. (2010). “Managing Time and Making Space: Canadian Students’ Motivations for Study in Australia.” Anthropology in Action 17(1):19–29.
- Beelen, J. (2007). Implementing internationalisation at home. EAIE Professional Development Series for International Educators, Volume 2. Amsterdam: EAIE.
- Beelen, J. and Leask, B. (2011). Internationalisation at Home on the Move. Internationalisation of European Higher Education: Learning & Teaching. Berlin: Raabe Academic.
- Bergknut, K. (2007). Case study: Malmö University, Sweden. In L. Beelen (Ed.), Implementing Internationalisation at Home (pp. 80-86). Amsterdam: EAIE.
- Callan, H. (2000). Higher education internationalization strategies: Of marginal significance or all-pervasive? The international vision in practice: A decade of evolution. Higher Education in Europe, 25(1), 15-23.
- Childress, L. K. (2010). The twenty-first century university: Developing faculty engagement in internationalization. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
- Crowther, P., Joris, M., Otten, M., Nilsson, B. & Watcher, B. (2000). Internationalisation at home: A position paper. Amsterdam: EAIE.
- De Jong, H. & Teekens, H. (2003). The case of the University of Twente: Internationalisation as education policy. Journal of Studies in International Education, 7(1), 41-51.
- † Uluslararasılaşmanın değerlendirilmesinde kullanılan göstergeler girdiler (inputs), çıktılar (outputs) ve sonuçlar (outcomes) olmak üzere üç kategoride toplanabilir (Brandenburg and Federkeil, 2007: 8; Hudzik and Stohl, 2009: 14):
- De Wit, H. (2002). Internationalization of higher education in the United States of America and Europe: A historical, comparative, and conceptual analysis. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
- De Wit, H. (2011). Trends, issues and challenges in internationalisation of higher education.
- Amsterdam: Centre for Applied Research on Economics and Management, Hogeschool van Amsterdam.De Wit, H. ve Callan, H. (1995). Internationalisation of higher education in Europe. In H. de Wit (ed.)Strategies for internationalisation of higher education: Acomparative study of Australia, Canada, Europe and the United States of America. Amsterdam: EAIE.
- Egron-Polak, E. (2005). Universities in the new global economy: Actors or spectators. Creating knowledge, strengthening nations: The changing role of higher education, 56-66.
- Hudzik, J., K. (2011). Comprehensive internationalization: From concept to action. (Report). Retrieved from http://www.nafsa.org/Resource_Library_Assets/Publications_Library/Comprehe
- Hudzik, J., K. and Stohl, M. (2009). Modelling assessment of the outcomes and impacts of internationalisation. In H. de Wit (Ed.), Measuring success in the
- Hudzik, J., K., and McCarthy, J., S. (2012). Leading comprehensive internationalization: Strategy and tacticsfor action (Comprehensive Report). Retrieved from http://www.nafsa.org/Resource_Library_Assets/Publications_Library/Leading_C
- Knight, J. (2008). Higher education in turmoil: The changing world of internationalization. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
- Knight, J. and de Wit, H. (1995). Strategies for internationalisation of higher education: Historical andconceptual perspectives. In H. de Wit (Ed.), Strategies for internationalisation of higher education: Acomparative study of Australia, Canada, Europe and the United States of America (pp. 5-32). Amsterdam: European Association for International Education.
- Leask, B. (2007). Diversity on campus – an institutional approach: a case study from Australia. In H. Teekens (Ed.), Internationalisation at home: Ideas and ideals (pp. 33-39). Amsterdam: EAIE.
- Leask, B. (2009). Using formal and informal curricula to improve interaction between home and international students. Journal of Studies in International Education, 13, 205-221.
- Mcburnie, G. (2002). Küreselleşme, GATS ve ulus-aşırı eğitim (Çev.: H. Koç ve G. Tunalı Koç). Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 2 (1), 169–190.
- Mestenhauser, J. A. (2003). Building bridges. International Educator, 12, 6-11.
- Mestenhauser, J. A. (2011). Reflections on the past, present, and future of internationalizing higher education:Discovering opportunities to meet the challenges. Minneapolis, MN: Global Programs & Strategy Alliance, University of Minnesota.
- Nilsson, B. (2003). Internationalisation at home from a Swedish perspective: The case of Malmö. Journal of Studies in International Education, 7(1), 27-40.
- Nilsson, B. (2007). A nightingale sang in Malmö square: The story of the nightingale programme at MalmöUniversity, Sweden. In H. Teekens (Ed.), Internationalisation at home: Ideas and ideals (pp. 61-67). Amsterdam: EAIE.
- Nussbaum, M. (2006) Education for Democratic Citizenship. Institute of Social Studies Public Lecture Series 2006, No. 1. The Hague: Institute of Social Studies
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2014). Education at a glance 2014: OECD indicators. Paris, France: OECD.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2015). Education at a glance 2015:Otten, M. (2003). Intercultural learning and diversity in higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 7, 12-26.
- Paige, R. M. (2005). Internationalization of higher education: Performance assessment and 32 indicators. Nagoya Journal of Higher Education, 99-123.
- Paige, R. M., & Mestenhauser, J. A. (1999). Internationalizing educational administration. Educational Administration Quaterly, 35, 500-516.
- Scott, P. (2002). Küreselleşme ve üniversite: 21. yüzyılın önündeki meydan okumalar (Çev.: S. Çiftçi). Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 2(1),191–208.
- Stier, J. (2002). Internationalisation in higher education: unexplored possibilities and unavoidable challenges. 20.10.2014 tarihinde www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00002342.htm adresinden elde edildi.
- Stier, J. (2003). Internationalisation, ethnic diversity and the acquisition of intercultural competencies. Intercultural Education, 14(1), 78-91.
- Teekens, H. (2003). The requirement to develop specific skills for teaching in an intercultural setting. Journal of Studies in International Education, 7(1), 108119
- Teekens, H. (2007). Internationalisation at home: An introduction. In H. Teekens (Ed.), Internationalisation athome: Ideas and ideals (Vol. 20, pp. 3-11). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: European Association for International Education.
- Vural Yılmaz, D. (2014). Yükseköğretimde Uluslararasılaşma: Türkiye’de Ulusal Siyasalar, KurumsalStratejiler ve Uygulamalar, Doktora Tezi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Isparta, 2014.
- Wachter, B. (2003). An introduction: Internationalisation at Home in Context. Journal of Studies in International Education, 7(1), 5-11.
