Auditing Fair Value Measurements And Other Complex Estimates: A State-Of-The-Art Literature Review And Research Guidelines

Author :  

Year-Number: 2019-37
Language : null
Konu :
Number of pages: 3089-3105
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

The standard setters argue that Financial Accounting Theory is derived from a basically coherent conceptual framework, currently focussed on ‘comprehensive income’ as measured by ‘changes in assets and liabilities’, in turn preferably measured at fair values. Within this regard, it is obvious that fair value measurement has gained so much importance among both financial statement preparers and as well as auditors. To help understand how auditing has evolved within this evolving fair value based accounting world, this study provides a detailed literature review on auditing of fair value accounting measurements and other complex estimates. I splitted the literature into three parts such as association between auditing fair value measurements and audit quality, audit fees and other challanges and constraints on auditing fair value measurements. Besides, this detailed literature analysis is conducted on three dimensions: (1) Fair value accounting and its evolution through standard setters, practitioners and academics, (2) an emphasis on the auditor’s need to understand how fair value measurements are prepared in both reel and financial sector, and (2) the audit steps and procedures necessary to verify and attest to fair value measurements, including an awareness of the potential biases inherent in auditing fair value.

Keywords

Abstract

The standard setters argue that Financial Accounting Theory is derived from a basically coherent conceptual framework, currently focussed on ‘comprehensive income’ as measured by ‘changes in assets and liabilities’, in turn preferably measured at fair values. Within this regard, it is obvious that fair value measurement has gained so much importance among both financial statement preparers and as well as auditors. To help understand how auditing has evolved within this evolving fair value based accounting world, this study provides a detailed literature review on auditing of fair value accounting measurements and other complex estimates. I splitted the literature into three parts such as association between auditing fair value measurements and audit quality, audit fees and other challanges and constraints on auditing fair value measurements. Besides, this detailed literature analysis is conducted on three dimensions: (1) Fair value accounting and its evolution through standard setters, practitioners and academics, (2) an emphasis on the auditor’s need to understand how fair value measurements are prepared in both reel and financial sector, and (2) the audit steps and procedures necessary to verify and attest to fair value measurements, including an awareness of the potential biases inherent in auditing fair value.

Keywords


  • Alexander, D., & Archer S. (2000). On the myth of “Anglo-Saxon” financial accounting. International

  • Alexander, D., & Archer S. (2000). On the myth of “Anglo-Saxon” financial accounting. International Journal of Accounting, 35(4), 539-557.

  • Alexander, D., & Archer S. (2003). On the myth of “Anglo-Saxon” financial accounting: A REsponse to Nobes. International Journal of Accounting, 38(4), 503-504.

  • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 1972. Due Professional Care in the Performance of Work. AU Section 230. New York, NY: AICPA.

  • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 1989. Auditing Accounting Estimates. AU Section 342. New York, NY: AICPA.

  • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2000. Auditing Derivative Instruments, Hedging Activities, and Investments in Securities. AU Section 332. New York, NY: AICPA.

  • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2003a. Auditing Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. AU Section 328. New York, NY: AICPA.

  • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2003b. Auditing Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures: A Toolkit for Auditors. New York, NY: AICPA.

  • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2011. Auditing Accounting Estimates,

  • Ball, R. (2006). International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): pros and cons for investors. Accounting and business research, 36(sup1), 5-27.

  • Balvers, R., McDonald, B., & Miller, R. (1988). Underpricing of new issues and the choice of auditors as a signal of investment banker reputation. The Accounting Review, 63(4), 605–622.

  • Bamber, E. M., Ramsay, R. J., & Tubbs, R. M. (1997). An examination of the descriptive validity of thebelief-adjustment model and alternative attitudes to evidence in auditing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(3-4), 249-268.

  • Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., & Rendleman Jr, R. J. (1998). Option pricing-based bond value estimates and a fundamental components approach to account for corporate debt. Accounting Review, 73-102.

  • Beatty, R. (1989). Auditor reputation and the pricing of initial public offerings. The Accounting Review, 64(4), 693–709.

  • Benston, G. J., & Hartgraves, A. L. (2002). Enron: What happened and what we can learn from it? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 21(2), 105-127.

  • Bepari, M. K., & Mollik, A. T. (2015). Effect of audit quality and accounting and finance backgrounds ofaudit committee members on firms’ compliance with IFRS for goodwill impairment testing. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 16(2), 196-220.

  • Bratten, B., Gaynor, L. M., McDaniel, L., Montague, N. R., & Sierra, G. E. (2013). The audit of fair valuesand other estimates: The effects of underlying environmental, task, and auditor-specific factors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(sp1), 7-44.

  • Cannon, N. H., & Bedard, J. C. (2016). Auditing challenging fair value measurements: Evidence from the field. The Accounting Review, 92(4), 81-114.

  • Chen, Y., Ge, R., & Zolotoy, L. (2017). Do corporate pension plans affect audit pricing?. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 13(3), 322-337.

  • DeAngelo, L. (1981). Auditor independence, ‘low-balling’, and disclosure regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(2), 113–127.

  • De George, E. T., Ferguson, C. B., & Spear, N. A. (2012). How much does IFRS cost? IFRS adoption and audit fees. The Accounting Review, 88(2), 429-462.

  • Deloitte. 2010. Springing forward: The eighth annual fair value pricing survey. Deloitte DevelopmentLLC.Available at: http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-UnitedStates/Local%20Assets/Documents/FSI/ us_fsi_im_fairvalue_march10.pdf

  • Dumontier, P., & Raffournier, B. (1998). Why firms comply voluntarily with IAS: An empirical analysis with Swiss data. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 9(3), 216-245.

  • Earley, C. E., V. B. Hoffman, and J. R. Joe. 2008. Reducing management’s influence on auditors’judgments: An experimental investigation of SOX 404 assessments. The Accounting Review 83 (6): 1461– 1485.

  • Ettredge, M. L., Xu, Y., & Yi, H. S. (2014). Fair value measurements and audit fees: Evidence from the banking industry. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(3), 33-58.

  • Ferramosca, S., Greco, G., & Allegrini, M. (2017). External audit and goodwill write-off. Journal of Management & Governance, 21(4), 907-934.

  • Folpmers, M., and P. de Rijke. 2009. A mark-to-model approach to the value of residential mortgage backed securities. Journal of Asset Management 11 (1): 55–61.

  • Francis, J. R., & Wang, D. (2008). The joint effect of investor protection and Big 4 audits on earnings quality around the world. Contemporary accounting research, 25(1), 157-191.

  • Francis, J. R., Richard, C., & Vanstraelen, A. (2009). Assessing France's joint audit requirement: Are two heads better than one?. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 35-63.

  • Gibbins, M., Salterio, S., & Webb, A. (2001). Evidence about auditor–client management negotiation concerning client’s financial reporting. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(3), 535-563.

  • Goncharov, I., Riedl, E. J., & Sellhorn, T. (2014). Fair value and audit fees. Review of Accounting Studies, 19(1), 210-241.

  • Griffin, P. A., Lont, D. H., & Sun, Y. (2009). Governance regulatory changes, International FinancialReporting Standards adoption, and New Zealand audit and non‐audit fees: empirical evidence. Accounting & Finance, 49(4), 697-724.

  • Griffin, J. B. (2010). The effects of uncertainty and disclosure on auditors' fair value materiality decisions (Doctoral dissertation, uga).

  • Griffin, J. B. (2014). The effects of uncertainty and disclosure on auditors' fair value materiality decisions. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(5), 1165-1193.

  • Griffith, E. E., Hammersley, J. S., Kadous, K., & Young, D. (2014). Auditor mindsets and audits of complex estimates. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(5).

  • Gul, F. A., & Krishnan, G. V. (2002). Has audit quality declined? Evidence from the pricing of discretionary accruals.

  • Hackenbrack, K., & Nelson, M. W. (1996). Auditors' incentives and their application of financial accounting standards. Accounting Review, 43-59.

  • Hay, D. C., Knechel, W. R., & Wong, N. (2006). Audit fees: A Meta‐analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary accounting research, 23(1), 141-191.

  • Hoogendoorn, M. (2006). International accounting regulation and IFRS implementation in Europe and beyond–experiences with first-time adoption in Europe. Accounting in Europe, 3(1), 23-26.

  • Hung, M., & Subramanyam, K. R. (2007). Financial statement effects of adopting international accounting standards: the case of Germany. Review of accounting studies, 12(4), 623-657.

  • International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). 2011. The conceptual framework for financialreporting. Available at: http://www.ifrs.org/IFRSs/Documents/English%20Web%20summaries/ Conceptual%20Framework.pdf

  • International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). 2008a. Auditing Accounting Estimates,Including Fair Value Accounting Estimates, and Related Disclosures. International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 540. New York, NY: IAASB.

  • International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). 2008b. Challenges in Auditing Fair ValueAccounting Estimates in the Current Market Environment. Staff Accounting Practice Alert. New York, NY: IAASB.

  • International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). 2008c. Basis for Conclusions: AuditingAccounting Estimates, Including Fair Value Accounting Estimates, and Related Disclosures. ISA 540 (Revised and Redrafted). New York, NY: IAASB.

  • International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). 2011. Special Considerations in Auditing Financial Instruments. International Auditing Practice Note 1000. New York, NY: IAASB.

  • Jenkins, J. G., & Haynes, C. M. (2003). The persuasiveness of client preferences: An investigation of theimpact of preference timing and client credibility. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(1), 143- 154.

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.

  • Jermakowicz, E. K., & Gornik-Tomaszewski, S. (2006). Implementing IFRS from the perspective of EUpublicly traded companies. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 15(2), 170-196.

  • Jung, S. J., Kim, B. J., & Chung, J. R. (2016). The association between abnormal audit fees and auditquality after IFRS adoption: Evidence from Korea. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 24(3), 252-271.

  • Kieso, D. E., Weygandt, J. J., & Warfield, T. D. (2010). Intermediate accounting: IFRS edition (Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons.

  • Kim, J. B., Liu, X., & Zheng, L. (2012). The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on audit fees: Theory and evidence. The Accounting Review, 87(6), 2061-2094.

  • King, A. M. (2006). Fair value for financial reporting: meeting the new FASB requirements. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Knechel, W. R., Naiker, V., & Pacheco, G. (2007). Does auditor industry specialization matter? Evidence from market reaction to auditor switches. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 26(1), 19-45.

  • Krishnan, G. V. (2003). Audit quality and the pricing of discretionary accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(1), 109–126.

  • Kumarasiri, J., & Fisher, R. (2011). Auditors' Perceptions of Fair‐Value Accounting: Developing Country Evidence. International Journal of Auditing, 15(1), 66-87.

  • Laux, C., & Leuz, C. (2009). The crisis of fair-value accounting: Making sense of the recent debate. Accounting, organizations and society, 34(6-7), 826-834.

  • Lhaopadchan, S. (2010). Fair value accounting and intangible assets: Goodwill impairment and managerial choice. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 18(2), 120-130.

  • Lee, C., & Park, M. S. (2013). Subjectivity in fair-value estimates, audit quality, and informativeness of other comprehensive income. Advances in Accounting, 29(2), 218-231.

  • Lin, H. L., & Yen, A. R. (2016). The effects of IFRS experience on audit fees for listed companies in China. Asian Review of Accounting, 24(1), 43-68.

  • Lobo, G. J., Paugam, L., Zhang, D., & Casta, J. F. (2017). The effect of joint auditor pair composition on audit quality: Evidence from impairment tests. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(1), 118-153.

  • Loukil, L. (2016). The Impact of IFRS on the Amount of Audit Fees: The Case of the Large French Listed Companies. Quarterly Journal of Finance and Accounting, 54(1/2), 41.

  • Maksymov, E., Nelson, M. W., & Kinney Jr, W. R. (2014). Planning audits of fair values: Interactiveeffects of frame and perceived verifiability of audit procedures. Johnson School Research Paper Series, (20-2012).

  • Marden, R. E., & Brackney, K. S. (2009). Audit risk and IFRS. The CPA Journal, 79(6), 32.

  • Martin, R. D., Rich, J. S., & Wilks, T. J. (2006). Auditing fair value measurements: A synthesis of relevant research. Accounting Horizons, 20(3), 287-303.

  • McDaniel, L. S., & Kinney, W. R. (1995). Expectation-formation guidance in the auditor's review of interim financial information. Journal of Accounting Research, 59-76.

  • Menon, K., & Williams, D. (1991). Auditor credibility and initial public offerings. The Accounting Review, 66(2), 313–332.

  • Nelson, M. W. (2009). A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 1-34.

  • Nelson, M. W., & Kinney Jr, W. R. (1997). The effect of ambiguity on loss contingency reporting judgments. Accounting Review, 257-274.

  • Palmrose, Z. -V. (1988). An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality. The Accounting Review, 63(1), 55–73.

  • Palmrose, Z. V. (2006). Maintaining the value and viability of independent auditors as gatekeepers under SOX: An auditing master proposal. Financial gatekeepers: Can they protect investors, 103-135.

  • Penman, S. H. (2007). Financial reporting quality: is fair value a plus or a minus?. Accounting and business research, 37(sup1), 33-44.

  • Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2004. Auditing Fair Value. Standing Advisory Group Meeting. September 8–9. Washington, DC: PCAOB.

  • Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2006. Using the Work of a Specialist. Standing Advisory Group Meeting. February 9. Washington, DC: PCAOB.

  • Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2007. Auditing Accounting Estimates and Fair Value Measurements. Standing Advisory Group Meeting. June 21. Washington, DC: PCAOB.

  • Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2009. Auditing Fair Value Measurements andUsing the Work of a Specialist. Standing Advisory Group Meeting. October 14–15. Washington, DC: PCAOB.

  • Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2011a. Report on 2010 Inspection of KMPG LLP. November 8. Washington, DC: PCAOB.

  • Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2011b. Report on 2010 Inspection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. November 8. Washington, DC: PCAOB

  • Ramanna, K., & Watts, R. L. (2012). Evidence on the use of unverifiable estimates in required goodwill impairment. Review of Accounting Studies, 17(4), 749-780.

  • Robinson, D., Smith, T., & Valencia, A. (2015). An investigation ofmanagerial opportunism in level three fair value estimates under SFAS 157. Working paper. University of South Florida.

  • Ronen, J. (2008). To fair value or not to fair value: a broader perspective. Abacus, 44(2), 181-208.

  • Ronen, J., ‘The Dual Role of Accounting: A Financial Economics Perspective’, in J. L. Bicksler (ed.), Handbook of Financial Economics, North Holland, 1981.

  • ——, ‘A Market Solution to the Accounting Crisis’, The New York Times, 8 March 2002a.

  • ——, ‘Policy Reforms in the Aftermath of Accounting Scandals’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Winter 2002b.

  • ——, ‘Post-Enron Reform: Financial Statement Insurance and GAAP Re-Visited’, Stanford Journal of Law, Business and Finance, Autumn 2002c.

  • Ryan, S. G. 2008. Accounting in and for the subprime crisis. The Accounting Review 83 (6): 1605–1638.

  • Schelleman, C., & Knechel, W. R. (2010). Short-term accruals and the pricing and production of audit services. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 221-250.

  • Singh, J. P., & Doliya, P. (2015). On the audit of fair value measurements. Ekonomski horizonti, 17(1), 59.Song, C. J., Thomas, W. B., & Yi, H. (2010). Value relevance of FAS No. 157 fair value hierarchyinformation and the impact of corporate governance mechanisms. The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1375-Teoh, S., & Wong, T. (1993). Perceived auditor quality and the earnings response coefficient. The Accounting Review, 68(2), 346–366.

  • Trompeter, G. (1994). The effect of partner compensation schemes and generally accepted accounting principles on audit partner judgment. Auditing, 13(2), 56.

  • Vyas, D. 2011. The timeliness of accounting write-downs by U.S. financial institutions during the financial crisis of 2007–2008. Journal of Accounting Research 49 (3): 823–860.

  • Weil, J. (2010). Mark-to-make-believe perfumes rotten bank loans. Bloomberg Opinion.

  • Yaacob, N. M., & Che-Ahmad, A. (2012). Audit fees after IFRS adoption: Evidence from Malaysia. Eurasian Business Review, 2(1), 31-46.

  • Yao, D. F. T., Percy, M., & Hu, F. (2015). Fair value accounting for non-current assets and audit fees:Evidence from Australian companies. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 11(1), 31-45.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics