INVESTIGATION OF THE LEVEL AND SOCIAL ANXIETY LEVEL OF THE INDIVIDUALS IN THE RECREATION ACTIVITIES

Author :  

Year-Number: 2018-19
Language : null
Konu :
Number of pages: 1974-1982
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, rekreasyon faaliyetlerine katılan bireylerde, yalnızlık ve sosyal anksiyete düzeylerinin incelenmesidir. Çalışmaya, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesinde öğrenim gören, rekreasyon faaliyetlerine katılan (n:159) ve katılmayan (n:152) toplam 311 üniversite öğrencisi katılmıştır. Çalışmada, öğrencilerin yalnızlık düzeylerini belirlemek için Russel, Peplau ve Ferguson (1978) tarafından geliştirilen Yaparel (1984) tarafından Türkçeye uyarlanan “UCLA Yalnızlık Ölçeği”, sosyal anksiyete düzeyini belirlemek için Liebowitz (1987) tarafından geliştirilen, Dilbaz (2001) tarafından Türkçeye uyarlanmış, “Liebowitz Sosyal Anksiyete Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde, yüzde ve frekans analizleri yapılmış, ölçeklerin güvenilirlikleri ve faktör analizinde Cronbach’s Alfa katsayıları bulunmuş, KMO ve Bartlett’s testleri, Pearson korelasyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Sonuç olarak; yalnızlık düzeyi ile rekreasyon faaliyetlerine katılım arasında anlamlı farklılık bulunmamıştır. Fakat, ortalama değerlere göre rekreasyon faaliyetlerine katılan bireylerin daha az yalnızlık duygusu yaşadıkları görülmektedir. Sosyal anksiyete ile rekreasyon faaliyetlerine katılım arasında anlamlı farklılık bulunmuştur. Rekreasyon faaliyetlerine katılmayan bireylerin sosyal anksiyete durumunu daha fazla yaşadığı belirlenmiştir. Yalnızlık ve sosyal anksiyete düzeyinin cinsiyet ve gelir durumu değişkenine göre anlamlı farklılık göstermediği bulunmuştur. Fakat kadınların sosyal anksiyete durumunu erkeklerden daha fazla yaşadığı belirlenmiştir. Yaş değişkeni ile yalnızlık arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmazken, yaş değişkeni ile sosyal anksiyete arasında anlamlı farklılık bulunmuştur. Kardeş sayısı ile yalnızlık düzeyi arasında anlamlı farklılık bulunmuştur. Kardeş sayısı ve sosyal anksiyete arasında anlamlı farklılık bulunmamıştır. Kardeşi olmayan veya 1 kardeşe sahip bireylerde yalnızlık düzeyinin düşük, kardeş sayısı fazla olan bireylerde yalnızlık düzeyinin yüksek olması da dikkat çekicidir.

Keywords

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the levels of loneliness and social anxiety of the individuals involved in recreational activities. A total of 311 university students of Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, participated in the study who are participants in recreational activities (n: 159) and non-participants (n: 152). The "UCLA Loneliness Scale" developed by Russel, Peplau, and Ferguson (1978) and adapted to Turkish by Yaparel (1984) was used in the study to determine the loneliness levels of the students. The "Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale" developed by Liebowitz (1987) and adapted to Turkish by Dilbaz (2001) was used to determine the level of social anxiety. In the analysis of the data, percentage and frequency analyzes were performed, Cronbach's alpha coefficients were found in the reliability and factor analysis of the scales, KMO and Bartlett's tests, Pearson correlation analysis were used. As a result; there was no significant difference between levels of loneliness and participation in recreational activities. However, according to the average values, individuals participating in recreational activities seem to have less sense of loneliness. Significant differences were found between social anxiety and participation in recreational activities. Individuals who did not participate in recreational activities were found to have more social anxiety. It was found that loneliness and social anxiety level did not show any significant difference according to gender and income status variable. However, it has been determined that women experience more social anxiety than men. There was no significant correlation between age and loneliness, but there was a significant difference between age and social anxiety. Significant differences were found between the number of siblings and the level of loneliness. There was no significant difference between siblings and social anxiety. It is noteworthy that the level of loneliness is low in individuals who have no siblings or one sibling, and that the level of loneliness is high in individuals with a high number of siblings.

Keywords


  • Akkaya, S. (2008). The popüler culture activities and leisure time habits of the üniversity students, Anadolu

  • Akkaya, S. (2008). The popüler culture activities and leisure time habits of the üniversity students, Anadolu University, Institute of Social Sciences, Master Thesis, Eskisehir.

  • Akkul, N. & Ümmet, D. (2018). Loneliness level of technical education faculty students, http://dspace.marmara.edu.tr/bitstream/handle/11424/1504/1375-2431-1-SM.pdf

  • American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, FifthEdition (DSM-5), Diagnostic Criteria Reference Manual (Translated by Ed. E Köroğlu) Physicians Publication Association, 617-704, Ankara.

  • Bulus, M. (1997). Loneliness in university students, Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 3, 82-90.

  • Çağlar, M.; Dinçyürek, S. & Arsan, N. (2012). Examination of social anxiety at üniversity level students, Hacettepe University, Journal of Education, 43,106-116.

  • Demir, A. (1989). UCLA Yalnızlık ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Psikoloji Dergisi, 7-23.

  • Dereli, F.; Koca, B. & Demircan, S. (2010). The investigation of loneliness level of elderly individuals residing in rest home, New Medical Journal, 27, 93-97.

  • Dilbaz, N. & Güz, H. (2001). Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale Validity and Reliability, The 37th National Congress of Psychiatry Abstract Book, Istanbul.

  • Dilbaz, N. & Güz, H. (2006). Sosyal Anksiyete Bozukluğunun Fenomenolojisi. Tükel R, Alkın T, (Editörler). Anksiyete Bozuklukları, Türkiye Psikiyatri Derneği Yayınları, Ankara: 185-212.

  • Drakou, A.; Tzetzis, G. & Mamantzi, K. ( 2008). Leisure constraints experienced by university students in Greece, The Sport Journal, 11(1).

  • Eskin, M. (2001). Adolescent Loneliness, Coping Methods and the Relationship of Loneliness to Suicidal Behavior, Clinical Psychiatry Journal, 4, 5-11.

  • Furmark, T. (2002). Social phobia: overview of community surveys. Acta Psychiatr Scand, 105(2), 84-93.

  • Gümüş, H. (2016). Rekreasyonel Alanların Kullanım Etkenlerinin İncelenmesi. Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

  • Heinrich, Liesl M., Eleonora Gullone. (2006). The clinical signifiance of loneliness: A literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 695-718.

  • Kaba, (2009). Current Situation of Campus Recreation Campus Recreation at universities in Turkey and Modeling, Master Thesis, Marmara Üniversity, Institute of Health Sciences, İstanbul.

  • Karagün, E. (2008). The effect of recreative activities on phobic attıtutes of the university students who showsocial phobia characteristics, Doctorate Thesis, Kocaeli University, Institute of Health Sciences, Kocaeli.

  • Kılıç, M. (2011). Serbest Zaman Etkinliklerinin (Rekreasyonun) Çocuk Suçluluğunun Önlenmesindeki İşlevinin İncelenmesi. 1.Türkiye Çocuk Hakları Kongresi.

  • Kocovski, N.L. & Endler, N.S. (2000). Social anxiety, self-regulation, and fear of negative evaluation. Eur J Pers, 14(4), 347-58.

  • Kozaklı, H. (2006). Comparison of Relationships between Loneliness and Social Support Levels of University Students, Master Thesis, Mersin University, Institute of Social Sciences, Mersin.

  • Kuyu, Ş.İ. (2016). The Impact of Parental Psychological Control on Bulimia Nervosa Symptoms and SocialAnxiety Disorder in Youth: The Role of Interpreting Factors of Loneliness and Anger, Adnan Menderes Üniversity, Institute of Health Sciences, Master Thesis, Aydın.

  • Li, X. (2011). The relative research on rejection sensitivity, self-esteem, social support and social anxiety ofteenagers education and management, Communications in Computer and Information Science, 210, 54-60. Liebowitz, M.R. (1987). Social phobia, Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry, 22,141-173.

  • Liebowitz, M.R.; Campaes, R. & Hollander, E. (1987). MAOI’s: Impact on social phobia on social behaviour (letter), Psychiatry Res, 22, 89-90.

  • Liebowitz, M.R.; Fyer, A.J., Gorman, J.M. et all. (1985). Specificity of lactate infusions in social phobia versus panic disorders, Am J Psychiatry,142, 947-950.

  • Mavric, F.; Kahrovic, I., Muric, B. & Radenkovic, O. (2014). The effects of regular physical exercise on the human body. Physical Culture, 68(1), 29-38.

  • Menec, V. (2003). The relationship between everyday activities and successful aging: A 6 year longitudinal stud. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences. 58(2),74‐82.

  • Ökmen, A.; Şadan, Erdemir İ. & Tekin, H.A. (2009). The Comparison of Level of Socialization on StudentsTaking Elective Course, Physical Education, Art and Music Education, Balıkesir Üniversity, Institute of Social Sciences, 12 (21),1-6.

  • Özşaker ve ark. (2016). Problematic internet usage and loneliness in the context of leisure time attitude: anevaluation in terms of participation in recreative activities, International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports &Science Education 5 (3).

  • Russell, D.W.; Peplau, L.A. & Ferguson, M.L. (1978). Developing a Measure of Loneliness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 42, 290-294.

  • Seçim, Alpar, Algür, (2014). Loneliness on university students: an empirical research at Akdeniz Unıversity, Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, Winter 13, 48, 200-215.

  • Soykan, Ç.; Özgüven, H.D. & Gençöz, T. (2003). Liebowitz Socıal Anxiety Scale: The Turkish Version. Psychological Reports, 93, 1059-1069.

  • Sübaşı, G. (2007). Some Variables For Social Anxiety Prediction in College Students, Education and Science, 32(144).

  • Tunç, A. Ç. (2015). The effect of sports on university students' social anxiety and subjective well-being. Master Thesis, Selcuk University, Health Sciences Institute, Konya.

  • Ülgen, S.Y. (2012). An Investigation of Factors Affecting Social Participation in Home-Living Elders. Master Thesis. Pamukkale University Health Sciences Institute. Denizli.

  • Yaman, M. & Arslan, S. (2009). Recreative sports in preventing child and youth crime, Journal of Human Sciences, 6(1), 445-459.

  • Yaparel, R. (1987). A Study on the Relation between Religious Life and Psycho-Social Adaptation in Twenty-Forty Persons, Doctoral Thesis, Ankara University, Social Sciences Institute, Ankara.

  • Yıldırım, E. (2008). The Effect of Physical and Recreational Activity on the Loneliness Level in Older Women, Master Thesis, Erciyes University, Institute of Health Sciences, Kayseri.

  • Yılmaz, E.; Yılmaz, E., & Karaca, F. (2008). Examining the level of social support and loneliness ofuniversity students, General medical journal, 18(2), 71-79. Retrieved from http://geneltip.org/upload/sayi/56/GTD-00447.pdf.

  • Yüceant, M. & Ünlü, H. (2017). The analysis of social appearance anxiety levels of physical education teacher candidates in terms of different variables. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 19, 1, 102-108.

  • Zorba, E.; Kesim, Ü., Ağılönü, A. & Cerit, E. (2009). Determination of participation levels of recreationalactivities of university students (Muğla University Example). 9th International Sports Science Congress Proceeding Book, pp. 43-44.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics