Bağımsız Denetim Firması Özelliklerinin Finansal Raporlama Kalitesine Etkisi: Borsa İstanbul’da Bir Araştırma

Author :  

Year-Number: 2022-103
Yayımlanma Tarihi: 2022-10-26 23:30:23.0
Language : Türkçe
Konu : Muhasebe
Number of pages: 3335-3346
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Alınan kararların amacına uygun ve tutarlı olabilmesi, kuşkusuz karar aşamasında kullanılan güvenilir bilgiler ile mümkün olabilmektedir. Sermaye piyasalarının etkin işleyişi için önemli bir unsur olan finansal raporların doğruluğunun ve güvenilirliğinin artırılmasında ise bağımsız denetim hizmetine ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Bu çerçevede çalışma, bağımsız denetim firması özelliklerinin şirket tarafından sunulan finansal raporların kalitesine etki edip etmediğinin analiz edilmesini amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, 2017-2020 yılları arasında Borsa İstanbul’da yer alan ve imalat sektöründe işlem gören şirketlere ait 608 firma/yıl verisi regresyon analizi ile test edilmiştir. Finansal raporlama kalitesi üzerine Türkiye örnekleminde yapılan sınırlı sayıdaki çalışmayı farklı bir bakış açısıyla destekleyen bu çalışmada, finansal raporlama kalitesini temsilen DeFond ve Park (2001) tarafından geliştirilen AWCA (Abnormal Working Capital Accruals) Modeli tercih edilmiştir. Çalışmada bağımsız denetim firmasının 4 Büyük üyesi olma durumu, yıllık denetim geliri ve denetlediği kamu yararını ilgilendiren kuruluş sayısı ile sunulan finansal raporların kalitesi arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir. Çalışmanın bulguları, bağımsız denetim firmasının 4 Büyük olma durumu ile finansal raporların kalitesi arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki olduğuna işaret etmektedir.

Keywords

Abstract

Undoubtedly, it is possible for the decisions taken to be appropriate and consistent with the purpose of the reliable information used in the decision stage. An independent audit service is needed to increase the accuracy and reliability of financial reports, which are an important element for the effective functioning of capital markets. In this context, the study aims to analyze whether the characteristics of audit firm affect the quality of the financial reports submitted by the company. For this purpose, 608 firm/year data belonging to companies listed in Borsa Istanbul and traded in the manufacturing sector between 2017-2020 are tested with regression analysis. In this study, which supports the limited number of studies on financial reporting quality in the Turkish sample from a different perspective, the AWCA (Abnormal Working Capital Accruals) Model developed by DeFond and Park (2001) was preferred to represent the financial reporting quality. In the study, the relationship between the independent audit firm's status of being a member of the Big 4, the annual audit income and the number of public interest institutions it audits, and the quality of the financial reports presented are examined. The findings of the study indicate that there is a statistically significant relationship between the status of the independent audit firm as the Big 4 and the quality of financial reports.

Keywords


  • 1. Aamir, S. & Farooq, U. (2011). “Auditor Client Relationship and Audit Quality: The Effects of Long-Term Auditor Client Relationship on Audit Quality in SMEs, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Umea University, İsveç.

  • 2. Akçay, Ö. & Bilen, A. (2019). “Denetim Kalitesinin Kar Yönetimi Üzerine Etkisi: Bist-100 Firmaları Üzerine Bir Uygulama”, Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (83):25-44.

  • 3. Bauwhede, H. V. (2003). “Audit Quality, Ownership and Firm’s Discretionary Accruals Management”, The International Journal of Accounting, 38(1):1-22.

  • 4. Becker, C. L., DeFond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J. & Subramanyam, K. R. (1998). “The effect of audit quality on earnings management”, Contemporary accounting research, 15(1):1-24.

  • 5. Bergen, D. V. (2013). “Auditor Industry Specialization and Audit Quality”, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Tilburg University, Hollanda.

  • 6. Cameran, M., Prencipe A. & Trombetta, M. (2016). “Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation and Audit Quality”, European Accounting Review, 25(1):35-58.

  • 7. Carey, P. & Simnett, R. (2006). “Audit Partner Tenure and Audit Quality”, The Accounting Review, 81(3):653- 676.

  • 8. Cengiz, S., Dinç, Y. & Güngör S. (2017). “Bağımsız Denetim Kalitesinin Finansal Performans Üzerindeki Etkisinin İncelenmesi: Borsa İstanbul’da Bir Uygulama”, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(19):171-197.

  • 9. Cheng, Y.S., Chen, Y.S. & Chen, Y.C. (2013). “Direct and Mediating Effects of Auditor Quality on Auditor Size and Performance”, International Business Research, 6(11):134-148.

  • 10. Chou, J., Zaiats, N. & Zang, B. (2014). “Does Auditor Choice Matter to Foreign Investors? Evidence from Foreign Mutual Funds Worlwide”, Journal of Banking&Finance, 46:1-20.

  • 11. Corbella, S., Florioa, C., Gotti, G. & Mastrolia, S.A. (2015). “Audit Firm Rotation, Audit Fees and Audit Quality: The Experience of Italian Public Companies”, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 25:46-66.

  • 12. Daferighe, E. E. & George E. M. (2020). “Audit Firm Attributes and Financial Reporting Quality of Quoted Manufacturing Firms in Nigeria”, International Journal of Economics and Management Studies (SSRGIJEMS), 7(1):43-55.

  • 13. Davidson, R. & Neu, A. D. (1993). “A Note on the Association between Audit Firm Size and Audit Quality”, Contemp. Account. Res, 9(2):479-488.

  • 14. Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). “Detecting earnings management”, The Accounting Review, 70:193-225.

  • 15. DeFond, M. L., & Park, C. W. (2001). “The Reversal of Abnormal Accruals and the Market Valuation of Earnings Surprises”, The Accounting Review, 76(3):375-404.

  • 16. Dehkordi, D.F. & Makarem, N. (2011). “The Effect of Size and Type of Auditor on Audit Quality”, Int. Res. J. Financ. Econ., 80:122-137.

  • 17. Duff, A. (2009). “Measuring Audit Quality in an Era of Change: An Empirical Investigation of UK Audit Market Stakeholders in 2002 and 2005”, Managerial Auditing Journal, 24(5):400-422.

  • 18. Ferguson, D. & Stokes, J. (2003). “The effects of firm-wide and office-level industry expertise on audit pricing”, Account. Rev., 78(2):429-449.

  • 19. Francis, J. R. (2004). “What Do Auditors Know About Audit Quality?”, The British Accounting Review, 36(4):345-368.

  • 20. Francis, J. R. & Wang, D. (2008). “The joint effect of investor protection and Big4 audits on earnings quality around the World”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 25:157-160.

  • 21. Francis, J. R. & Wilson, E. R. (1988). “Auditor Changes: A Joint Test of Theories Relating to Agency Costs and Auditor Differentiation”, The Accounting Review, 63(4):663-682.

  • 22. Francis, J, & Yu, M. (2009). “Big4 Office Size and Audit Quality”, Account. Rev., 84(5):1521-1552.

  • 23. Gujarati, D. N. (2004). “Basic Econometrics (4th ed.)”, USA, New York: McGraw Hill.

  • 24. James, I. O. & Izien, O. F. (2014). “Audit Firm Characteristics And Audit Quality in Nigeria”, International Journal of Business, 3(5):187-195.

  • 25. Jeong, S. & Rho, W. J. (2004). “Big Six auditors and audit quality: the Korean evidence”, Int. J. Account., 39(2):175-196.

  • 26. Jordan, C.E., Clark, S.J. & Hames, C.C. (2010). “The Impact of Audit Quality on Earnings Management to Achieve User Reference Points in EPS”, The Journal of Applied Business Research, 26(1):19- 30.

  • 27. Jusoh, M. A. & Ayoib, C. A. (2014). “Equity Ownership, Audit Quality and Firm Performance in Malaysia Using Generalized Least Square Estimations Technique”, Journal of Emerging Issues in Economics, Finance and Banking (JEIEFB), 3(1):976-991.

  • 28. Khurana, I.K. & Raman, K.K. (2004). “Litigation risk and the financial reporting credibility of Big 4 versus Non-Big 4 audits: Evidence from Anglo-American Countries”, The Accounting Review, 79(2):473-495.

  • 29. Klein, A. (2002). “Audit Committee, Board of Director Characteristics, and Earnings Management”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(3):375-400.

  • 30. Lennox, S. C. (1999). “Audit Quality and Auditor Size: An Evaluation of Reputation and Deep Pockets Hypotheses”, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 26(7-8):779-805.

  • 31. Memiş, M. & Çetenak, E. H. (2012). “Earnings Management, Audit Quality and Legal Environment: An International Comparison”, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 2(4):460-469.

  • 32. Myers, J. N., Myers L. A. & Omer, T. C. (2003). “Exploring the Term of the Auditor-Client Relationship and the Quality of Earnings”, The Accounting Review, 78:779-799.

  • 33. Park, Y. W. & Shin, H. H. (2004). “Board composition and earnings management in Canada”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(3):431-457.

  • 34. Peasnell, K. V., Pope, P. F. & Young, S. (2005). “Board monitoring and earnings management: Do outside directors influence abnormal accruals?”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 32(7-8):1311-1346.

  • 35. Pham, N. K., Duong, H. N. & Quang T.P. (2017). “Audit Firm Size, Audit Fee, Audit Reputation, And Audit Quality: The Case of Listed Companies in Vietnam”, Asian Journal of Finance&Accounting, 9(1):429-447.

  • 36. Poli, S. (2017). “The Relationship Between Shareholder Gender and Earnings Management in Private Italian Companies”, International Journal of Business and Management, 12(1):11-27.

  • 37. Postma, E. (2016). “The Effects of Audit Firm Rotation on Audit Quality: Does Audit Firm Rotation Improve Audit Quality?”, Master Thesis, MSc in Business Administration -Financial Management, Universiteit Twente.

  • 38. Sawan, N. & Alsaqqa, I. (2013). “Audit firm size and quality: Does audit firm size influence audit quality in the Libyan oil industry?”, African Journal of Business Management, 7(3):213-226.

  • 39. Sayyar, H., Basiruddin, R., Abdul, S. & Sayyar, L. (2014). “Mandatory Audit Firm and Audit Partner Rotation”, European Journal of Business and Management, 6(26):352-389.

  • 40. Schipper, K. (1989). “Commentary On Earnings Management”, Accounting Horizons, 3(4):91-102.

  • 41. SPK, Seri:IV No:54 Erişim Tarihi: 25.07.2021). T.C. Resmi Gazete (11 Ekim 2011. Sayı: 28081). Sermaye Piyasası Kurulu, Seri:IV No:54.

  • 42. Tepeli, Y. & Kayıhan, B. (2020). “Firma Karakteristiklerinin Denetim Firması Tercihi Üzerindeki Etkisinin Analizi: BİST Şirketleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 22(2):336-354.

  • 43. Tıkmak, E., Kabak, E. & Aktaş, H. (2016). “Denetimin Değeri”, Günce Reklam Yayıncılık Matbaa San. Tic. Ltd. Şti.

  • 44. Tsipouridou, M. & Spathis, C. (2012). “Earnings management and the role of auditors in an unusual IFRS context: The case of Greece”, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 21:62-78.

  • 45. Tuan, K. (2019). “Bağımsız Denetim Hizmetinin Kalitesi ve Finansal Performans: Borsa İstanbul Örneği”, Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, (649):69-81.

  • 46. Yanık, S. & Karataş, M. (2017). “Denetim Raporlarının Geleceği; Yeni Düzenlemeler ve Ülke Uygulamaları”, Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (73):1-26.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics