Author :
DOI : 10.26449/sssj.762
Year-Number: 2018-21
Language : null
Konu :
Abstract
Bu çalışmada, sıkılık-esneklik ile performans arasındaki ilişkide psikolojik güçlendirmenin aracı rolü incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın örneklemini 197 turizm sektörü çalışanı oluşturmaktadır. Sıkılık-esneklik ile psikolojik güçlendirme boyutlarından anlamlılık ve kontrol algısı arasında orta düzeyde pozitif korelasyon bulunmuştur. Anlamlılık ve kontrol algısı ile iş performansı arasında ki orta düzeyde olumlu ilişki literatür ile uyumludur. Sıkılık-esneklik bileşeni ile çalışanın performans algısı arasında ılımlı pozitif ilişki gözlenmiştir. Regresyon analizi bulgularına göre Sıkılık-esneklik ile iş performansı arasındaki ilişkide psikolojik güçlendirmenin aracı rolü olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.
Keywords
Abstract
In this study, the mediating role of psychological empowerment between tightness-looseness and performance was examined. The sample of the survey is composed of 197 tourism sector employees. A moderately positive correlation was found between tightness-looseness and psychological empowerment dimensions, meaning and control perception. The moderate positive relationship between meaning and control perception and job performance is consistent with the literature. A moderate positive correlation was observed between the tightness-looseness component and the performance perception of the employee. According to the findings of regression analysis, it is concluded that the relationship between tightness-looseness and job performance has an mediating role in psychological empowerment.
Keywords
- Afzali, A., Motahari, A.A. ve Loghman, H.S. (2014). Investigating the influence of perceived organizational
- Afzali, A., Motahari, A.A. ve Loghman, H.S. (2014). Investigating the influence of perceived organizationalsupport, psychological empowerment and organizational learning on job performance: an empirical investigation. Tehnički Vjesnik, 21(3), 623-629.
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice– Hall.
- Baron, R.M., ve Kenny, D.A. (1986). The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social PsychologicalResearch: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 1173–1182.
- Berry, J.W. (1966). Temne and Eskimo Perceptual Skills. International Journal of Psychology. 1: 207-229.
- Berry, J.W. (1967). Independence and Conformity in Subsistence-Level Societies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 7: 415-418.
- Boldt, E.D. (1978a). Structural tightness and cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 9, 151-165.
- Boldt, E.D. (1978b). Structural tightness, autonomy, and observability: An analysis of Hutterite conformity and orderliness. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 3, 349-363.
- Boldt, E.D. ve Roberts, L.W. (1979). Structural tightness and social conformity: A methodological note with theoretical implications. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,10, 221-230.
- Bowen, D.E., ve Lawler, E.E. (1992). The empowerment of service workers: What, why, how, and when. Sloan Management Review, Spring, 31-39.
- Bowen, D.E., ve Lawler, E.E. (1995). Empowering service employees. Sloan Management Review, Summer, 73-84.
- Burns, T. ve Stalker, G. 1994. The management of innovation. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Chan, D.K-S., Gelfand, M.J, Triandis, H.C., & Tzeng, O. (1996). Tightness-looseness revisited: Some preliminary analyses in Japan and the United States. International Journal of Psychology, 31,1-12.
- Cameron, K.S. 2004. A Process for Changing Organizational Culture, M. Driver (Der.), The handbook of organizational development.
- Conger, J.A. ve Kanungo, R.N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13, 471-482.
- Çöl, G. (2008). Algılanan güçlendirmenin işgören performansı üzerine etkileri. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 9(1), 35-46
- Davies, M., Laschinger, H.K.S. ve Andrusyszyn, M. (2006). Clinical Educators’ Empowerment, JobTension, and Job Satisfaction: A Test of Kanter’s Theory. Journal for Nurses in Staff Development, 22(2) 78-86.
- Dysvik, A. ve Kuvaas, B. (2011), Intrinsic motivation as a moderator on the relationship between perceivedjob autonomy and work performance, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20:3, 367- 387.
- Erdem, H., Gökmen, Y. ve Türen, U. (2015), Psikolojik Sermayenin Örgütsel Özdeşleşme Üzerine Etkisinde Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin Aracılık Rolü, İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7/2, 38-62.
- Fernandez, S., ve Moldogaziev, T. (2011). Empowering Public Sector Employees to Improve Performance: Does It Work? American Review of Public Administration 41(1): 23–47.
- Fernandez, S. ve Moldogaziev, T. (2013). Employee Empowerment, Employee Attitudes, and Performance: Testing a Causal Model. Public Administration Review, Vol. 73(3), pp. 490–506.
- Fulford, M.D. ve Enz, C.A. (1995). The Impact of Empowerment on Service Employees. Journal of Managerial Issues,7, 161-175.
- Gelfand, M.J., Nishii, L.H. ve Raver, J.L. 2006. On the nature and importance of cultural tightness and looseness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 1225-1244.
- Guthrie, J. (2001). High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 180-192.
- Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin, F. (2016). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri: Felsefe‐Yöntem‐Analiz, 3. Baskı, Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
- Jones, G. R. (1984). Task visibility, free-riding and shirking: Explaining the effect of structure and technology on employee behavior. Academy of Management Review, 9:684-695.
- Joyce, W.F. ve Slocum, J. (1984). Collective climate: Agreement as a basis for defining aggregate climates in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 27(4), 721-724.
- Khandwalla, P.N. (1976). Some top management styles, their context and performance. Organization and Administrative Sciences, 7(4): 21-51.
- Kanter, R.M. (1977). Men and Women of the Corporation. Basic Books, New York.
- Klecker, B.J. ve Loadman, W. (1996). Exploring the relationship between teacher empowerment and teacherjob satisfaction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Association, Chicago.
- Kim, S. (2002). Participative management and job satisfaction: Lessons for management leadership. Public Administration Review, 62, 231-241.
- Kirkman, B.L. ve Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 58-74.
- Kuokkanen, L., Leino-Kilpi, H. Katajisto, J. (2003). Nurse empowerment, job-related satisfaction, and organizational commitment. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 18:3, 184-192.
- Lee, H., Cayer, N.J. ve Lan, G.Z. (2006). Changing federal government employee attitudes since the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26, 21-51.
- Lawler, E.E., III., Mohrman, S.A. ve Ledford, G.E. (1995). Creating high performance organizations: Impact of employee involvement and total quality management. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Li, C., Fock, H. ve Mattila, A.S. (2012). The role of Cultural Tightness-Looseness in the Ethics of Service Recovery. Journal of Global Marketing. 25(1), 3-16.
- Liden, R.C., Wayne, S.J. ve Stilwell, D. (1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader– member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 662–674.
- Liden, R.C., Wayne, S.J., Jaworski, R.A. ve Bennett, N. (2004). Social loafing: A field investigation. Journal of Management, 30(2):285–304.
- Manz, C.C. ve Angle, H. (1986). Can group self-management mean a loss of personal control: Triangulating a paradox. Group & Organization Studies, 11:309-334.
- Miri, A., Rangriz, H. ve Sabzikaran, E. (2011). The relationship between organizational structure andemployees’ empowerment in National Iranian Oil Products Distribution Company. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 1(1), 51-68.
- Nielsen, J.F. ve Pedersen, C.P. (2003). The consequences and limits of empowerment in financial services. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 19, 63-83.
- Nunnally, J.C. (1978), Psychometric theory (2nd ed.), New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Özel, N. (2013). Çok Boyutlu Kuram Arayışları Bağlamında İşgören Güçlendirme Üzerine Meta-KuramsalBir Yaklaşım: Güçlendirmeye Koşulsallık Yaklaşımı, Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 9(18), Pelto, P. (1968). The difference between “tight” and “loose” societies. Transaction, 5: 37–40.
- Quinn, R.E. ve Spreitzer, G.M. (1997). The Road to Empowerment: Seven Questions Every Leader Should Consider. Organizational Dynamics. 26(2): 37-49.
- Sakal, Ö. ve Aytekin, İ. (2014). Bireycilik-Toplulukçuluk Değerlerinin Başarı Amaç Yönelimlerine Etkisi Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir Araştırma, KAU İİBF Dergisi, 5(8), 45-66.
- Sarmiento, T.P., Laschinger, H.K.S. ve Iwasiw, C. (2004) “Nurse Educators’ Workplace Empowerment, Burnout, and Job Satisfaction: Testing Kanter’s Theory” Journal of Advanced Nursing, 46(2):134-143.
- Schein, E.H. 1992. Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, JosseyBass.
- Schein, E.H. 1996. Culture: The missing concept in organizational studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 229-240.
- Seibert, S.E., Silver, S.R. ve Randolph, W.A. (2004). Taking empowerment to the next level: a multiple levelmodel of empowerment, performance and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 332-350.
- Spreitzer, G.M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442-1465.
- Spreitzer, G.M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 483-504.
- Spreitzer, G. (2007) “Taking stok: A Review of More Than Twenty Years of Research on Empowerment atWork” J. Barling(Ed), CP. Cooper(Ed), In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Behaviour: Volume 1. pp.54-72.
- Sobel, M.E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S.Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological Methodology 1982 (pp.290-312). Washington DC: American Sociological Association.
- Thomas, K.W. ve Velthouse, B.A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15, 666-681.
- Ton, İ.A. (2008), “Bireycilik–Toplulukçuluk ve Güvenin İşyerinde Güçlendirmeye Olan Etkileri”, Yayınlanmış Doktora Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, Beta Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
- Triandis, H.C. 1989. The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96(3):Ugboro, I.O. ve Obeng, K. (2000).Top management leadership, employee empowerment, job satisfaction,and customer satisfaction in TQM organizations: an empirical study, Journal of Quality Management, 5, pp.247–272.
- Uz, I. (2014). The index of cultural tightness and looseness among 68 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology.
- Wasti, S.A. ve Fiş, A.M. (2010). Örgüt Kültüründe Sıkılık-Esneklik. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi. 10 (1- 2), 11-33.
- Wright, B.E. ve Kim, S. (2004). Participation’s influence on job satisfaction: The importance of job characteristics. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 24, 18-40.
- Witkin, H.A. ve Berry, J.W. (1975). Psychological differentiation in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 6, 4-87.
