Özgeciliğe Yeni Bir Bakış Açısı: Ahlaki Çözülme ve Ahlaki Üst Biliş

Author :  

Year-Number: 2022-102
Yayımlanma Tarihi: 2022-09-30 22:07:44.0
Language : İngilizce
Konu : Psikoloji
Number of pages: 2855-2863
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Araştırmacılar ve uygulayıcılar, özellikle son dönemlerde artan sosyal ihtiyaçlarla özgecilikle ilgili değişkenleri bulmaya ilgi göstermektedirler. Son zamanlarda yapılan araştırmalar, üst biliş gibi bilişsel değişkenlerin yanı sıra ahlaki eylemler gibi ahlaki kavramların özgecil davranışla ilişkili olduğunu göstermiştir. Bu çalışma, ahlaki üst biliş ile ahlaki çözülme ve özgecil davranış arasındaki ilişkiyi kesitsel bir desenle incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaçla, genel popülasyondan yüz yüze toplanan 181 katılımcıdan oluşan bir örneklemle bir anket çalışması oluşturulmuştur. Çalışmada ahlaki üst biliş ölçeği, ahlaki çözülme ölçeği ve özgecilik ölçeğinin yanı sıra demografik soru formu kullanılmıştır. Regresyon modelini test etmek için SPSS v27 kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar, ahlaki çözülmenin özgecilik ile ters yönde ilişkili olduğunu, ahlaki üstbilişin ise özgecilik ile pozitif olarak ilişkili olduğunu göstermektedir. Özellikle, ahlaki üstbilişin dört alt boyutundan ikisi olan bilişin düzenlenmesi ve bildirimsel biliş bilgisi alt boyutları özgecilik ile pozitif yönde ilişkili bulunmuştur. Diğer yandan, ahlaki üst bilişin diğer iki alt boyutu olan yöntemsel ve koşullu biliş ile özgecilik arasında ilişki bulunamamıştır. Mevcut çalışma, farklı sosyoekonomik grupların özgecil davranışları arasında bir fark bulunmazken, kadınların erkeklerden daha özgecil olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca, manevi inançlara sahip olmak özgeci davranışlarla olumlu bir şekilde ilişkili olduğu raporlanmıştır. Ayrıca, uygulama ve teoriye yönelik Türk kültürüne yönelik çıkarımlara ilişkin tartışmalar da çalışmada yer almaktadır.

Keywords

Abstract

Researchers and practitioners have shown a growing interest in finding the variables related to altruism through many factors. Recent studies have shown that various cognitive concepts, such as metacognitions as well as moral concepts like moral actions are related to altruistic behavior. This study aims to investigate the relation of moral metacognitions and moral disengagement and altruistic behavior with a cross-sectional design. For this purpose, a survey study was constructed with a sample of 181 participants, collected from general population in a paper form. SPSS v27 was used to test the regression model. Moral meta cognitions, moral disengagement, altruism scales and demographic form were conducted. The results show that moral disengagement is negatively related to altruism, while moral metacognition is positively associated with altruism. Specifically, two of the four sub-dimensions of moral metacognitions as the regulation of cognition and cognition knowledge sub-dimensions are positively related to altruism. The remaining two sub-dimensions of moral metacognitions as declarative and conditional knowledge were not associated with altruism. The current study found that women were more altruistic than men while no difference is found between different socioeconomic groups’ altruistic behaviors. Furthermore, having spiritual beliefs are associated positively with altruistic behavior. Finally, the discussions regarding the implications for practice in Turkish culture and theory are provided in the study.

Keywords


  • 1. Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2011). Social Psychology: international edition.

  • 2. ARPACI, P., & Özmen, D. (2014). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin özgecilik ve empatik eğilim düzeyleri ve aralarındaki ilişki. Hemşirelikte Eğitim ve Araştırma, 11(3), 51-57.

  • 3. Aquino, K. F., & Reed, A., II. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1423–1440

  • 4. Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development. Vol. 6. Six theories of child development (pp. 1-60). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press

  • 5. Bandura, Albert (1999). “Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities”. Personal and Social Psychology Review 3: 193-209.

  • 6. Bandura, A. (2002). Selective Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency Journal of Moral Education, Vol. 31, No. 2

  • 7. Bandura, A, Caprara, G. V.,Barbaranelli, C.,P., Concetta, R. C. (2002). Sociocognitive self-regulatory mechanisms governing transgressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 80(1), Jan 2001, 125-135

  • 8. Batson, C. D., Batson, J. G., Slingsby, J. K., Harrell, K. L., Peekna, H. M., & Todd, R. M. (1991). Empathic joy and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 413– 426. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.413

  • 9. Blackstone, Amy. 2003. "Gender Roles and Society." Pp 335-338 in Human Ecology: An Encyclopedia of Children, Families, Communities, and Environments, edited by Julia R. Miller, Richard M. Lerner, and Lawrence B. Schiamberg. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO. ISBN I-57607-852-3

  • 10. Bloom, P. (2012). Religion, morality, evolution. Annual review of psychology, 63, 179-199.

  • 11. Böckler, A., Tusche, A., Schmidt, P., & Singer, T. (2018). Distinct mental trainings differentially affect altruistically motivated, norm motivated, and self-reported prosocial behaviour. Scientific Reports, 8.

  • 12. Bykov, A. (2017). Altruism: New perspectives of research on a classical theme in sociology of morality. Current Sociology, 65(6), 797-813.

  • 13. Carreon, D., Davidson, P., Andersen, R., Nakazono, T. (2011). Altruism in dental students. Journal of health care for the poor and underserved, 22(1), 56–70.

  • 14. Caroli, M. E. & Sagone, E. (2014). Belief in a just world, prosocial behavior, and moral disengagement in adolescence. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116 ( 2014 ) 596 – 600

  • 15. Cesur, S. (1997). The relationship between cognitive and moral development. Unpublished master dissertation, Bogaziçi University

  • 16. Cohen, T. R., Panter, A. T., Turan, N., Morse, L., & Kim, Y. (2014). Moral character in the workplace. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(5), 943- 963.

  • 17. Doty, J. (2011). A 'Chance' Study in Moral Reasoning and Moral Development - A Case for Self-Awareness. The Journal of character & leadership Integration

  • 18. Eagly, A. H., & Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and Helping Behavior. A Meta-Analytic Review of the Social Psychological Literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 283-308. https://doi.org/10.1037/00332909.100.3.283

  • 19. Eisenberg-Berg, N., & Lennon, R. (1980). Alturism and the assessment of empathy in the preschool years. Child Development, 51, 552-557.

  • 20. Ellemers, N., Van Der Toorn, J., Paunov, Y., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2019). The psychology of morality: A review and analysis of empirical studies published from 1940 through 2017. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(4), 332-366.

  • 21. Fisher M. W., Dimaggio G., Hochheiser J., Vohs J., Phalen P., Lysaker P. H. (2020). Metacognitive capacity is related to self-reported social functioning and may moderate the effects of symptoms on interpersonal behavior. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 208 138–142. 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001117

  • 22. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive- developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.

  • 23. Grimm, P. (2010). Social Desirability Bias. In Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing (eds J. Sheth and N. Malhotra). doi:10.1002/9781444316568.wiem02057

  • 24. Hand, M. (2014). Towards a theory of moral education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 48(4), 519-532.

  • 25. Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. F., & May, D. R. (2011). Moral maturation and moral conation: A capacity approach to explaining moral thought and action. Academy of Management Review, 36, 663–685.

  • 26. Haski-Leventhal, D. (2009). Altruism and Volunteerism: The perceptions of altruism in four disciplines and their impact on the study of volunteerism. Journal for The Theory Of Social Behaviour. Volume 39, Issue 3, September, 271-299.

  • 27. Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online readings in psychology and culture, 2(1), 2307-0919.

  • 28. Huber JT, MacDonald DA. An Investigation of the Relations Between Altruism, Empathy, and Spirituality. Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 2012;52(2):206-221. doi:10.1177/0022167811399442

  • 29. Kenneth G. DeMarree, Pablo Briñol, Richard E. Petty (2014).The effects of power on prosocial outcomes: A self-validation analysis, Journal of Economic Psychology,Volume

  • 30. Krebs, D. (1982). Psychological approaches to altruism: An evaluation. Ethics, 92(3), 447-458.

  • 31. Kristin D. Neff, Kristin L. Kirkpatrick, Stephanie S. Rude (2007). Self-compassion and adaptive psychological functioning.Journal of Research in Personality,Volume 41, Issue 1,Pages 139-154, ISSN 0092-6566, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.03.004.

  • 32. Kohlberg, L. (1964). Development of moral character and moral ideology. Review of children development research, 383-431.

  • 33. Kohlberg, L. (1968). Early education: A cognitive-developmental view. Child development, 1013-1062.

  • 34. Kohlberg, L. (1995). Moralische entwicklung. In W. Althof (Ed.), Lawrence Kohlberg: Die psychologie der moralentwicklung (pp. 7-40). Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. (Original work published in 1968

  • 35. Luria, G., Cnaan, R. A., and Boehm, A. (2015). National culture and PROSOCIAL BEHAVIORs: results from 66 countries. Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Q. 44, 1041–1065. doi: 10.1177/0899764014554456

  • 36. Marsh, N., Scheele, D., Gerhardt, H., Strang, S., Enax, L., Weber, B., ... & Hurlemann, R. (2015). The neuropeptide oxytocin induces a social altruism bias. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(47), 15696-15701.

  • 37. McMahon, Joan M. & Good, Darren J. (2015): The Moral Metacognition Scale: Development and Validation, Ethics & Behavior.

  • 38. Moffitt, T.E., Caspi, A., Rutter, M., & Silva, P. A. (2001). Sex differences in antisocial behaviour: Conduct disorder, delinquency and violence in the Dunedin longitudinal study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge: University Press.

  • 39. Moran, S. (2009). Purpose: giftedness in intrapersonal intelligence. High Ability Studies, 20(2), 143–159

  • 40. Nelson, T. O. & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 125–173). New York, NY: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/ S0079-7421(08)60053-5.

  • 41. Paciello, M., Fida, R., Cerniglia, L., Tramontano, C., & Cole, E. (2013). High cost helping scenario: The role of empathy, prosocial reasoning and moral disengagement on helping behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(1), 3-7.

  • 42. Papaleontiou-Louca, E. (2008). Metacognition and theory of mind. New Castle upon Tyne, England: Cambridge Scholars Press

  • 43. Pellegrini, E. K., & Scandura, T. A. (2006). Leader–member exchange (LMX), paternalism, and delegation in the Turkish business culture: An empirical investigation. Journal of international business studies, 37(2), 264

  • 44. Phelps, E. S. (Ed.). (1975). Altruism, morality, and economic theory. Russell Sage Foundation.

  • 45. Post, S. G. (2007). Altruism and health: Perspectives from empirical research. Oxford University Press.

  • 46. Rand, D. G., Brescoll, V. L., Everett, J. A. C., Capraro, V., & Barcelo, H. (2016). Social heuristics and social roles: Intuition favors altruism for women but not for men. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(4), 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000154

  • 47. Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional science, 26(1), 113-125.

  • 48. Skoe, E. E., Cumberland, A., Eisenberg, N., Hansen, K., & Perry, J. (2002). The influences of sex and gender- role identity on moral cognition and prosocial personality traits. Sex Roles, 46(9), 295-309.

  • 49. Sönmez, S., Sarıçam, H., & Çelik, İ. (2018). Ahlâkî üstbiliş, makyavelist kişilik ve maneviyat arasındaki ilişki. Uluslararası Bilim ve Eğitim Kongresi 2018 (UBEK2018), 23-25.

  • 50. Sunar, D. (2020). Culture and gender influences on self-concept and the bases of self-esteem: Four Turkish studies. In Merging Past, Present, and Future in Cross-Cultural Psychology (pp. 387-395). Garland Science.

  • 51. Swanson, H Lee & Hill, Gloria. Metacognitive aspects of moral reasoning and behavior. Adolescence; Roslyn Heights Vol. 28, Iss. 111, (Fall 1993): 711-35.

  • 52. Ümmet, D., Halil, E. K. Ş. İ., & Otrar, M. (2013). Özgecilik (altruism) ölçeği geliştirme çalışması. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 11(26), 301-321.

  • 53. White, J. (2016). Moral Education and Education in Altruism: Two Replies to Michael Hand. Journal of Philosophy of Education, Vol. 50, No. 3.

  • 54. Yang, L., Cai, G., Yong, S., & Shi, H. (2020). Moral identity: A mediation model of moral disengagement and altruistic attitude. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 48(7), 1-13.Yavuzer N. (2017). Bir prososyal davranış kaynağı olarak özgeci motivasyonun ilgili alan yazını ışığında değerlendirilmesi. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi Cilt:14-1, Sayı:27, 2017-1, s.105-126

  • 55. Yöntem, M. K., ve İlhan T., (2013). Benlik kurguları ve otantikliğin özgecilik üzerindeki yordayıcı gücünün incelenmesi. International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 8/8 Summer 2013, p. 2291-2302, ANKARA-TURKEY

  • 56. Xue Wang, Zhansheng Chen, Kai-Tak Poon, Fei Teng, Shenghua Jin (2017). Self-compassion decreases acceptance of own immoral behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences,Volume 106, 329-333, ISSN 0191 8869,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.030

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics