Comparison of Rankings of Turkish Foundation Universities: Times Higher Education World University Rankings and EVAMIX Appraisal Score Rankings

Author :  

Year-Number: 2019-30
Language : null
Konu :
Number of pages: 1050-1057
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

In recent years, the number of foundation universities has increased, leading to higher competition among universities, which in turn causes universities to invest more effort in improvement works. For comparison, universities take into consideration various rankings that are internationally recognized and publicly shared. Times Higher Education World University Rankings (THEWUR) are considered to be one of the most recognized. This study examines 5 Turkish foundation universities that are in the top 1000 in THEWUR and also included in the Report for Foundation Higher Education Institutions published by The Council of Higher Education (CHE) in 2018. In this application, criteria other than those used in THEWUR are used and these universities are reordered using the EVAMIX method which is one of the multi-criteria decision-making methods. The rankings obtained are interpreted in comparison with THEWUR.

Keywords

Abstract

In recent years, the number of foundation universities has increased, leading to higher competition among universities, which in turn causes universities to invest more effort in improvement works. For comparison, universities take into consideration various rankings that are internationally recognized and publicly shared. Times Higher Education World University Rankings (THEWUR) are considered to be one of the most recognized. This study examines 5 Turkish foundation universities that are in the top 1000 in THEWUR and also included in the Report for Foundation Higher Education Institutions published by The Council of Higher Education (CHE) in 2018. In this application, criteria other than those used in THEWUR are used and these universities are reordered using the EVAMIX method which is one of the multi-criteria decision-making methods. The rankings obtained are interpreted in comparison with THEWUR.

Keywords


  • Aytaç Adalı, E. (2016, September). EVAMIX ve TODIM Yöntemleri ile Sağlık Sektöründe Personel

  • Aytaç Adalı, E. (2016, September). EVAMIX ve TODIM Yöntemleri ile Sağlık Sektöründe Personel Seçimi. Alphanumeric Journal, 4(2), 70-83.

  • Darji, V., & Rao, R. (2013, November). Application of AHP/EVAMIX Method for Decision Making in the Industrial Environment . American Journal of Operations Research, 3, 542-569.

  • De Montis, A., De Toro, P., Droste-Franke, B., Omann, I., & Stagl, S. (2004). Assessing the quality ofdifferent MCDA methods. M. Getzner, C. L. Spash, & S. Stagl, Alternatives for Environmental Valuation (s. 99-133). London: Routledge.

  • Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995, August). Determining Objective Weights inMultiple Criteria Problems: The CRITIC Method. Computers and Operations Research, 22(7), 763- 770.

  • Saka, Y., & Yaman, S. (2011). Üniversite Sıralama Sistemleri; Kriterler ve Yapılan Eleştiriler. Journal of Higher Education and Science, s. 72-79.

  • Sargın, S. (2007). Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. Türkiye'de Üniversitelerin Gelişim Süreci ve Bölgesel Dağılımı, s. 133-150.

  • Stack, M. (2013). The Times Higher Education ranking product: visualising excellence through media. Globalisation, Societies and Education, s. 560-582.

  • Times Higher Education. (2018). Times Higher Education World University Rankings: Retrieved fromhttps://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university- rankings/methodology-world-university- rankings-2019

  • TÜBİTAK. (2018). Retrieved from http://ulakbim.tubitak.gov.tr/tr/haber/turkiyenin-en- girisimci-ve- yenilikci-universiteleri-aciklandi

  • Ulutaş, A., & Cengiz, E. (2018, February). CRITIC ve EVAMIX Yöntemleri ile Bir İşletme İçin Dizüstü Bilgisayar Seçimi. The Journal of International Social Research, 11(55), 881- 887.

  • URAP TURKEY. (2018). URAP TURKEY: Retrieved from http://www.urapcenter.org/2018/methodology.php?q=3

  • Voogd, H. (1982). Multicriteria Evaluation with Mixed Qualitative and Quantitative Data. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analitics and City Science, 9(2), 221-236.

  • Yükseköğretim Kurumu. (2018). Vakıf Yükseköğretim Kurumları Raporu. Yükseköğretim Kurumu: Retrieved from http://www.yok.gov.tr/documents/10279/43653871/vakif_yuksekogretim_2018.pdf

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics