PİYASALAR RASYONEL Mİ? ETKİN PİYASALAR HİPOTEZİ VE PİYASA ANOMALİLERİ

Author :  

Year-Number: 2018-16
Language : null
Konu :
Number of pages: 1362-1374
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Etkin piyasalar hipotezi (EPH), geleneksel finansın en önemli yapıtaşlarından bir tanesidir. EPH, menkul kıymetler fiyatlarının piyasadaki elde edilebilir tüm bilgiyi yansıtması gerektiğini ileri sürmektedir. Piyasaların etkinliği kavramı yatırımcılar ile ilgili iki argüman ortaya koymaktadır. Öncelikle yatırımcılar rasyonel ve faydalarını maksimize etmeye çalışan kişilerdir. İkinci olarak piyasa katılımcılarının piyasada aşırı kar etmesi mümkün değildir. EPH, otuz yılı aşkın bir süre finans dünyasının hakim modeli olmuştur. Bununla birlikte, 1990’ların sonlarına doğru yapılan çok sayıda çalışmada, hisse fiyatlarındaki aşırı dalgalanma, yatırımcıların aşırı tepkisi, getirilerde gözlemlenen sezonsallık, varlık balonları gibi nedenlerden dolayı piyasaların etkin olmadığı ortaya konulmuştur. Davranışsal finans, sermaye piyasalarındaki söz konusu gelişmeleri, yatırımcı davranışlarına ve piyasa etkinliğine yön veren psikolojik ve duygusal faktörler ile açıklamaya çalışmaktadır.

Keywords

Abstract

The efficient market hypothesis (EMH), is one of the cornerstones of traditional finance. EMH asserts that securities prices should fully reflect all the available information in the market. The concept of efficient market implies two argument related with the investors. Firstly, they are rational and utility maximizer. Secondly, market participants cannot earn excess profit in such a market. More than thirty years, EPH was the dominant model for financial world. However, since late 1990s, many studies have concluded market inefficiency because The EMH fails to explain excess volatility in stock prices, investor overreaction, seasonality in returns, asset bubbles, etc. Behavioral finance attempts to give some explanations to the psychological and emotional factors involved in the stock market and that affect the behavior of investors and the market efficiency.

Keywords


  • Akintoye, Ishola Rufus (2008); “Efficient Market Hypothesis and Behavioural Finance: A Review of

  • Akintoye, Ishola Rufus (2008); “Efficient Market Hypothesis and Behavioural Finance: A Review of Literature”, European Journal of Social Sciences, V.7, N.2.

  • Alper D ve Anbar T (2011); “ Proje Değerlemesinde Karar Ağacı Analizi ve Reel Opsiyon YaklaşımınınKarşılaştırılması”, Paradoks Ekonomi, Sosyoloji ve Politika Dergisi, Ocak, Cilt:7, Sayı:1, 47 -66, ISSN:1305-7979.

  • Andrew, W. Lo (2005); “Reconciling Efficient Markets with Behavioural Finance: The Adaptive Markets Hypothesis”, Recent Research, V.7, N.2.

  • Ardalan, Kavous (1996); “Game Theory, Information Economics, Rational Expectations, and EfficientMarket Hypothesis: Overviews and Exposition of Interconnections”, International Journal of Business, 1 (2).Brigham, F. Eugene (1995); Fundamentals of Financial Management, Seventh Edition, The Dryden Press, USA

  • Bullard, James B. (1991); “Learning, Rational Expectations and Policy: A Summary of Recent Research”,Federal Reserve Bank Of St Louis, January/February. https://research.stlouisfed.org/publications /review/91/01/Learning_Jan_Feb1991.pdf

  • Chaffi, Mustapha and Imed Medhioub (2014); “Behavioral Finance: An Empirical Study of the TunisianStock Market”, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, V.4., N.3., 527- 538., www.econjournals.com

  • Chuvakhin, Nikolai (2001); “Efficient Market Hypothesis And Behavioral Finance – Is A Compromise In Sight?”

  • Firat, Duygu ve Fettahoğlu Sibel (2011);“Investors’ Purchasing Behaviour via Behavioural Finance Approach”, International Journal of Business and Management, V.6, N.7, July. www.cesenet.org/ijbm

  • Frankfurter, George M (2007); “Market Efficiency cum Anomalies, or Behavioural Finance”, Homo Oeconomicus, 24 (1): 81 - 93

  • Gupta, Ekanshi, Preetibedi and Poonamlakra (2014); “Efficient Market Hypothesis vs Behavioural Finance”, IOSR Journal of Business and Management, V.16., Issue 4., Ver. IV, April, 56 – 60.

  • Jain, Vaibhav (2012); “An Insight Into Behavioral Finance Models, Efficient Market Hypothesis and ItsAnomalies”, Researchers World, Journal of Arts, Science & Commerce, V.III, Issue – 3(1), July. www.researchersworld.com

  • King, Michael R (2009); “The Cost of Equity for Global Banks: a CAPM perspective from 1990 to 2009”, BIS Quartely Review, September, 59 – 73. http://www.bis.org/publ/qtrpdf/r_qt0909g.pdf

  • Konstantinidis, Anastasios, Androniki Katarachia, George Borovas and Maria Eleni Voutsa (2012); “FromEfficient Market Hypothesis to Behavioural Finance: Can Behavioural Finance Be The New Dominant Model for Investing?”, Scientific Bulletin – Economic Sciences, Vol.11/ Issue 2.

  • Konte, Mamadou (2008); “Behavioural Finance or Efficient Market: Which is Right?”, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, Vol.II, July 2-4, London, U.K.

  • Kulalı, İhsan (2014); “Muhasebe Temelli Tahmin Modelleri Işığında, Finansal Sıkıntı ve İflasın Karşılaştırılması”, Sosyoekonomi, Haziran – Aralık, 154 – 170.

  • Latif, Madiha, Shanza Arshad, Mariam Fatima and Samia Farooq (2011); “Market Efficiency, MarketAnomalies, Causes, Evidences, and Some Behavioral Aspects of Market Anomalies, Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, Vol.2, No 9/10.

  • Malkiel, Burton G. (2003); “The Efficient Market Hypothesis and Its Critics”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 17, N.1, Winter, 59 – 82.

  • Maloney, M. T. (2006); “Fisher Seperation Theorem & Consumer Optimization”, Financial Economics, Clamson Economics, Revised, September 5. http://myweb.clemson.edu/~maloney/855/2.pdf

  • Mantysaari, Petri (2010); The Law of Corporate Finance: General Principles and EU Law, Volume III, Funding, Exit, Takeovers, Springer.

  • Markowitz, Harry (1952); “Portfolio Selection”, The Journal of Finance, V.7., No.1, March, 77-91. https://www.math.ust.hk/~maykwok/courses/ma362/07F/markowitz_JF.pdf

  • McCarthy, Mary, Paul Solomon, Paul Mihalek (2012); “Financial Crisis During 2007 And 2008: EfficientMarkets or Human Behaviour?”, The Journal of Applied Business Research, Vol. 28, N.6, November/December.

  • Moosa, Imad A (2011); “The Failure of Neoclassical Financial Economics: CAPM and its Pillars as anIllustration”, Journal Article, 33, The Capco Institute Journal of Financial Transformation. http://www.capco.com/uploads/articlefiles/292/file_0_1420618741.pdf

  • Novickyte, Lina and Augustas Degutis (2014); “The Efficient Market Hypothesis: A Critical Review of Literature And Methodology”, Ekonomika, V. 93 (2).

  • Pagano, Marco (2005); “The Modigliani – Miller Theorems: a Cornerstone of Finance”, BNL Quarterly Review, V.LVIII, N. 233-234, June-September, 237-247.

  • Sharma, Amlan Jyoti (2014); “The Behavioural Finance: A Challenge or Replacement to Efficient MarketConcept”, The SIJ Transactions on Industrial, Finance & Business Management (IFBM), Vol. 2, No.6, August.

  • Shefrin, Hersh and Meir Statman (2011); Behavioral Finance in the Financial Crisis: Market Efficiency,Minsky, and Keynes”, November, Santa Clara University, November. http://www.russellsage.org/sites/all/files/RethinkingFinance/Shefrin%20Statman%2001272012.pdf

  • Shiller, Robert J (2003); “From Efficient Markets Theory to Behavioral Finance”, Journal of EconomicPerspectives, Vol. 17, N.1, Winter, 83 – 104. http://aydogan.bilkent.edu.tr/man522/EfficientMarkets_ Shiller.pdf

  • Statman, Meir (1999); “Behavioural Finance: Past Battles and Future Engagements”, Association forInvestment Mangement and Research, November/December. http://www.scu.edu/business/finance/research /upload/bfpastbat.pdf

  • Yalçın, Kadir Can (2010); “Market Rationality: Efficient Market Hypothesis versus Market Anomalies”, European Journal of Economic and Political Studies”, ejeps – 3 (2).

  • Yiğiter, Şule Yüksel ve Kübra Saka Ilgın (2015); “BIST 100 Endeksinde Ocak Ayı Anomalisinin Güç Oranı Yöntemiyle Test Edilmesi”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, Cilt 30, Sayı:2, 171 – 187.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics