Kurumsal İletişim Yönetimi Ve Halkla İlişkiler

Author :  

Year-Number: 2019-30
Language : null
Konu :
Number of pages: 743-748
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Küreselleşmenin getirdiği yoğun rekabet ortamında kurumların kendilerini halka nasıl yansıttıkları gittikçe önem kazanmaktadır. Ayrıca kurumların mal veya hizmet üretmesinin yanında halkla kurmuş oldukları ilişkiler itibar düzeylerini de etkilemektedir. Bu kapsamda kurumlar için; tutarlı, dengeli ve kesintisiz bir iletişim performansı kaçınılmaz hale gelmiştir. Kurumların halkla olan ilişkilerinde hedeflerine ulaşması ve kurum vizyonunun yeniden tanımlanmasına sebebiyet veren çevresel faktörlere uyum sağlaması kilit bir süreçtir. Bu hedef ve uyum sağlama süreci ise iletişim kaynaklarının sistematik kullanımını gerektirmektedir. Bu kapsamda kavramsallaşan Kurumsal İletişim Yönetimi; halkla ilişkiler gereksinimlerini karşılayan çerçevenin belirlenmesi, kurumsal itibarın oluşturulması/geliştirilmesi/korunması ve nihai olarak kurumsal sürdürülebilirliğin sağlanması adına son derece önemlidir. Bu çalışmada, iletişim kaynaklarının oluşturulmasına ve kullanılmasına dayanan kurumsal iletişim yönetimi ile halkla ilişkiler arasındaki ilişki irdelenmiştir. Çalışma içeriğinde kullanılan “kurum” ifadesi hem kamu hem de özel kurumlara ithafen kapsayıcı bir anlam ihtiva etmektedir. Çalışmanın sonunda kurumsal iletişim yönetimini benimsemiş kurumların, halkla ilişkiler konusunda daha başarılı olabileceği ve bu kapsamda kurumsal iletişim yönetimi ile halkla ilişkiler arasında pozitif ve doğrusal bir ilişki olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Keywords

Abstract

It is very important how the institutions reflect themselves to the public in the competitive environment of globalization. In addition to producing goods or services for corporations, the relationships they have established with the public also affect their reputation levels. For this purpose; consistent, balanced and uninterrupted communication performance has become inevitable. In addition, it is a key process for institutions to reach their targets in their relations with the public and to adapt to the environmental factors that cause the redefinition of the corporate vision. This goal and adaptation process require the systematic use of communication resources. In this context, the conceptualized Corporate Communication Management; it is extremely important to identify the framework that meets the needs of public relations and to create / develop / protect the corporate reputation and ultimately ensure corporate sustainability. In this study, the relationship between corporate communication management and public relations, which is based on the creation and use of communication resources, was examined. The term “institution” used in the work context includes a comprehensive meaning that is dedicated to both public and private institutions. At the end of the study, it has been concluded that the institutions that have adopted corporate communication management can be more successful in public relations and in this context, there is a positive and linear relationship between corporate communication management and public relations.

Keywords


  • Andrews, K. (1971). The Concept of Corporate Strategy, IL: Dow-Jones-Irwin, Homewood.

  • Andrews, K. (1971). The Concept of Corporate Strategy, IL: Dow-Jones-Irwin, Homewood. Argenti, P.A. (2007). Corporate Communication, McGraw-Hill, New York.

  • Blombäck, A. & Scandelius, C. (2013). “Corporate Heritage in CSR Communication: A Means to Responsible Brand Image?”, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18(3): 362-382.

  • Cornelissen, J.P. (2008). Corporate Communication A Guide to Theory and Practice, Sage, London.

  • Davis, J. H.; Schoorman, F. D. & Donaldson, L. (1997). “Toward A Stewardship Theory of Management”, Academy of Management Review, 22(1): 20-47.

  • Dozier, D. M.; Grunig, L. A. & Grunig, J. E. (2013). Manager’s Guide to Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management, Routledge, London.

  • Gray, E. R. & Balmer, J. M. (1998). “Managing Corporate Image and Corporate Reputation”, Long Range Planning, 31(5): 695-702.

  • Grönroos, C. (2000). “Creating A Relationship Dialogue: Communication, Interaction and Value”, The Marketing Review, 1(1): 5-14.

  • Grönroos, C. (2004). “The Relationship Marketing Process: Communication, Interaction, Dialogue, Value”, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 19(2): 99-113.

  • Hartley, B. & Pickton, D. (1999). “Integrated Marketing Communications Requires A New Way of Thinking”, Journal of Marketing Communications, 5(2): 97-106.

  • Holm, O. (2006). “Integrated Marketing Communication: From Tactics to Strategy”, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 11(1): 23-33.

  • Hooghiemstra, R. (2000). “Corporate Communication and Impression Management - New Perspectives Why Companies Engage in Corporate Social Reporting”, Journal of Business Ethics, 27(1-2): 55-68.

  • Hutton, J. G. (1999). “The Definition, Dimensions, and Domain of Public Relations”, Public Relations Review, 25(2): 199-214.

  • Karatepe, S. & Ozan, M. S. (2017). “Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk ve Kurumsal İtibar İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme”, Akademik Yaklaşımlar Dergisi, 8(2): 80-101.

  • Kent, M. L. & Taylor, M. (2002). “Toward A Dialogic Theory of Public Relations”, Public relations Review, 28(1): 21-37.

  • Mohr, J. & Nevin, J. R. (1990). “Communication Strategies in Marketing Channels: A Theoretical Perspective”, The Journal of Marketing, 54(4): 36-51.

  • Morsing, M. & Schultz, M. (2006). “Corporate Social Responsibility Communication: StakeholderInformation, Response and Involvement Strategies”, Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4): 323- 338.

  • Parsons, T. (1956). “Suggestions for a Sociological Approach to the Theory of Organizations- I”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1(1): 63-85.

  • Schultz, M.; Hatch, M.J. & Larsen, M.H. (2000). The Expressive Organisation – Linking Identity, Reputation and the Corporate Brand, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • Schwartz, M.S. (2001). “The Nature of the Relationship between Corporate Codes of Ethics and Behavior”, Journal of Business Ethics, 32(3): 247-262.

  • Siano, A.; Vollero, A. & Confetto, M. G. & Siglioccolo, M. (2013). “Corporate CommunicationManagement: A Framework Based on Decision-Making with Reference to Communication Resources”, Journal of Marketing Communications, 19(3): 151-167.

  • Sriramesh, K. & Vercic, D. (2009). “The Relationship between Culture and Public Relations” The Global Public Relations Handbook, Routledge.

  • Steyn, B. (2004). “From Strategy to Corporate Communication Strategy: A Conceptualisation”, Journal of Communication Management, 8(2): 168-183.

  • Stroh, U. (2007). “An Alternative Postmodern Approach to Corporate Communication Strategy”, The Future of Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management, 1(1): 199-220.

  • Van Riel, C. B. (1995). Principles of Corporate Communication, Hemel Hempstead, Prentice-Hall.

  • Van Riel, C. B. & Fombrun, C. J. (2007). Essentials of Corporate Communication: Implementing Practices for Effective Reputation Management, Routledge.

  • Varey, R. J. (1998). “Locating Marketing within the Corporate Communication Managing System”, Journal of Marketing Communications, 4(3): 177-190.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics