FORMS OF IDENTITY: THE POST-SOVIET DYNAMICS OF CENTRAL ASIA

Author :  

Year-Number: 2018-18
Language : null
Konu :
Number of pages: 1915-1924
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Günümüzde Orta Asya bölgesi pek çok Büyük ve potansiyel Büyük Güçlerin yakın ilgisini çekmektedir. Elbette doğal kaynakların rolü çok önemlidir. Orta Asya'nın modern gelişimi büyük oranda çeşitli küresel süreçlerin gidişatı ve yönü ile ilgilidir. Bölgenin bağımsızlığını yeni elde eden devletleri, yeni jeopolitik koşullara ayak uydurabilmek için çok acı veren bir sürece katlanmak zorunda kaldılar. Aynı zamanda Türkî devletlerinin mevcut iç ve dış sorunlarının bir kısmının doğrudan Sovyet öncesi ve Sovyet geçmişiyle ilişkili olduğu da unutulmamalıdır. Bölgenin geleceği tarihi kültürel mirasını kabul etme veya reddetmesi ile yakından alakalıdır. İlk tercih gerçekleşirse birleşik ve kendisi ile bağışık yeni bir gelişim sözkonusu olabilir. İkinci tercih Sovyet sonrası beş ayrı devletin ayrı yollarda devam etmesini öngörecektir.

Keywords

Abstract

Contemporary Central Asia attracts the close attention of many Great and Potential Great Powers. The role played by natural resources in this regard is quıte obvious. The modern development of Central Asia is largely concerned with the course and direction of various global processes. The states that have gained independence in the region have had to pursue a difficult path to keep abreast of new geopolitical conditions. However, some of the current internal and external problems of the Turkic states are directly related to the pre-Soviet and Soviet past. The future of the region is closely related to its acceptance or rejection of its historical cultural heritage. If the first choice is agreed to, it may be lead to a new development, a truly united and unique region at ease with itself. The second choice suggests that the five post-Soviet states will continue to go their own separate ways.

Keywords


  • Abazov, R. (1999). The formation of post-Soviet international politics in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and

  • Abazov, R. (1999). The formation of post-Soviet international politics in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan.

  • Achilov, D. (2016). When actions speak louder than words: examining collective political protests in Central Asia. Democratization, 23(4), 699-722.

  • Akiner, S. (2003). The politicisation of Islam in postsoviet Central Asia. Religion, State & Society, 31(2), 97-122.

  • Allison, R. (2008). Virtual regionalism, regional structures and regime security in Central Asia. Central Asian Survey, 27(2), 185-202.

  • Bergne, P. (2007). Birth of Tajikistan: National identity and the origins of the republic. IB Tauris.

  • Bingol, Y. (2004). Nationalism and democracy in post‐communist Central Asia. Asian Ethnicity, 5(1), 43-Bohr, A. (2004). Regionalism in Central Asia: new geopolitics, old regional order. International Affairs,Chung, C. P. (2004). The Shanghai Co-operation organization: China's changing influence in Central Asia. The China Quarterly, 180, 989-1009.

  • Collins, K. (2009). Economic and security regionalism among patrimonial authoritarian regimes: the case of Central Asia. Europe-Asia Studies, 61(2), 249-281.

  • Cooley, A. (2012). Great Games, Local Rules: The New Power Contest in Central Asia. Oxford UniversityCornell, S. E., & Spector, R. A. (2002). Central Asia: More than Islamic Extremists. Washington Quarterly,Falkingham, J. (2005). The end of the rollercoaster? Growth, inequality and poverty in Central Asia and the Caucasus. Social Policy & Administration, 39(4), 340-360

  • Fedorov‐Davydov, G. A. (1983). Archaeological research in Central Asia of the Muslim period. World Archaeology, 14(3), 393-405.

  • Frank, A. G. (1992). The Centrality of Central Asia. Studies in History, 8(1), 43-97.

  • Grodekov, N. I. (1989). Kirgizy i karakirgizy Syr-Dar'inskoi oblasti [Kyrgyz and Karakyrgyz of the Syr- Darya Region]. Vol. 1. Tashkent: Tipolitografiya SI Lakhtina.

  • Gunn, T. J. (2003). Shaping an Islamic identity: religion, Islamism, and the state in Central Asia. Sociology of Religion, 64(3), 389-410.

  • Hagendoorn, L., Drogendijk, R., Tumanov, S., & Hraba, J. (1998). Inter-ethnic preferences and ethnic hierarchies in the former Soviet Union. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22(4), 483-503.

  • Hasanov, M. S., Nurysheva, G. G., Petrova, V. F., Syrgakbaeva, A. S., & Dzhaambaeva, B. A. (2016). Social and Cultural Transformation of Sovereign Kazakhstan. The Social Sciences, 11(12), 3095-3102.

  • Iji, T. (2001). Multiparty mediation in Tajikistan: The 1997 peace agreement. International Negotiation, 6(3), 357-385.

  • Jonson, L. (2004). Vladimir Putin and Central Asia: the shaping of Russian foreign policy (Vol. 1). IB Tauris.

  • Keller, S. (2001). To Moscow, Not Mecca: The Soviet Campaign Against Islam in Central Asia, 1917-1941. Greenwood Publishing Group.

  • Khalid, A. (2014). Islam after communism: religion and politics in Central Asia. Univ of California Press.

  • Kim, Y., & Indeo, F. (2013). The new great game in central Asia post 2014: The US “New Silk Road” strategy and Sino-Russian rivalry. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 46(2), 275-286.

  • Kulchik, Y., Fadin, A. V., & Sergeev, V. M. (1996). Central Asia after the empire. Pluto Press.

  • Laruelle, M. (2010). Russia and Central Asia. In The New Central Asia: The Regional Impact of International Actors (pp. 149-175).

  • Levi, S. (2007). Turks and Tajiks in Central Asian History. Everyday life in Central Asia: past and present,Luong, P. J. (2002). Institutional change and political continuity in Post-Soviet Central Asia: power, perceptions, and pacts. Cambridge University Press.

  • Luong, P. J. (Ed.). (2004). The transformation of Central Asia: States and societies from Soviet rule to independence. Cornell University Press.

  • Lynch, D. (2001). The Tajik civil war and peace process. Civil Wars, 4(4), 49-72.

  • March, A. F. (2003). State ideology and the legitimation of authoritarianism: The case of post-Soviet Uzbekistan 1. Journal of Political Ideologies, 8(2), 209-232.

  • Menon, R. (1995). In the shadow of the bear: security in post-Soviet Central Asia. International Security, Olcott, M. B. (1994). Central Asia's Islamic Awakening. Current History, 93(582), 150.

  • Omelicheva, M. Y. (2011). Islam in Kazakhstan: a survey of contemporary trends and sources of securitization. Central Asian Survey, 30(2), 243-256.

  • Peyrouse, S. (2007). Islam in Central Asia: national specificities and postsoviet globalisation. Religion, State & Society, 35(3), 245-260.

  • Rashid, A. (1999). The Taliban: exporting extremism. Foreign Affairs, 22-35.

  • Rashid, A. (2002). Jihad: the rise of militant Islam in Central Asia. New Haven.

  • Roy, O. (2005). The predicament of ‘civil society’in Central Asia and the ‘Greater Middle East’. International Affairs, 81(5), 1001-1012.

  • Rumer, B. Z. (Ed.). (2002). Central Asia: a gathering storm?. ME Sharpe.

  • Rumer, E. B., Trenin, D., & Zhao, H. (2007). Central Asia: Views from Washington, Moscow, and Beijing. ME Sharpe.

  • Schetter, C. (2017). Between Ignoring and Romanticizing: The Position of Area Studies in Policy Advice. In Area Studies at the Crossroads (pp. 83-99). Palgrave Macmillan US.

  • Tsygankov, A. P. (2003). Mastering space in Eurasia: Russia’s geopolitical thinking after the Soviet break- up. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 36(1), 101-127.

  • Weitz, R. (2006). Averting a new great game in central Asia. Washington Quarterly, 29(3), 155-167.Yiğit, S. (2013). Eurasian Union= Energy Union?, Middle Eastern Analysis/Ortadogu Analiz, 5(51).

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics